2002
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m110182200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifications in the C Terminus of the Synaptosome-associated Protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25) and in the Complementary Region of Synaptobrevin Affect the Final Steps of Exocytosis

Abstract: Fusion proteins made of green fluorescent protein coupled to SNAP-25 or synaptobrevin were overexpressed in bovine chromaffin cells in order to study the role of critical protein domains in exocytosis. Point mutations in the C-terminal domain of SNAP-25 (K201E and L203E) produced a marked inhibition of secretion, whereas single (Q174K, Q53K) and double mutants (Q174K/Q53K) of amino acids from the so-called zero layer only produced a moderate alteration in secretion. The importance of the SNAP-25 C-terminal dom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This does explain the dominantnegative nature of the mutation introduced here with respect to neuroexocytosis, and fits well with the specific action of BoNT/A and BoNT/C which cleave SNAP-25 just before and after Arg198, respectively, causing a dominant-negative effect with the characteristic long duration of action of these two neurotoxins (Eleopra et al, 1997;Eleopra et al, 1998;Meunier et al, 2003). The present model also explains the remarkable findings that the replacements of Lys201 and Leu203 with a negatively charged glutamate residue do not affect SNARE assembly but inhibits exocytosis in chromaffin cells (Criado et al, 1999;Gil et al, 2002) as these changes are disturbing the protein-protein contacts between adjacent SNARE complexes.…”
Section: Journal Of Cell Science 123 (19)supporting
confidence: 56%
“…This does explain the dominantnegative nature of the mutation introduced here with respect to neuroexocytosis, and fits well with the specific action of BoNT/A and BoNT/C which cleave SNAP-25 just before and after Arg198, respectively, causing a dominant-negative effect with the characteristic long duration of action of these two neurotoxins (Eleopra et al, 1997;Eleopra et al, 1998;Meunier et al, 2003). The present model also explains the remarkable findings that the replacements of Lys201 and Leu203 with a negatively charged glutamate residue do not affect SNARE assembly but inhibits exocytosis in chromaffin cells (Criado et al, 1999;Gil et al, 2002) as these changes are disturbing the protein-protein contacts between adjacent SNARE complexes.…”
Section: Journal Of Cell Science 123 (19)supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Chromaffin cells were isolated from bovine adrenal glands by collagenase digestion, and they were further separated from the debris and erythrocytes by centrifugation on Percoll gradients as described previously (Gutierrez et al, 1988;Gil et al, 2002). The cells were maintained as monolayer cultures in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 10 mM cytosine arabinoside, 10 mM 5-fluoro-29-deoxyuridine, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 mg/ml streptomycin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because CPXs bind to the assembled SNARE core complex (7), and SNARE proteins are known to play a role in the behavior of the fusion pore (27)(28)(29)(30)-the aqueous pore that initially connects the vesicle lumen and extracellular space during exocytosis-we tested whether the kinetics of fusion pore dilation is altered in the CPX II Ϫ/Ϫ chromaffin cells. We used amperometry, an electrochemical technique that directly reports the kinetics and amount of catecholamine release from individual vesicles.…”
Section: Cpx Isoform Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%