1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004600050102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of the transition rate in the hydrogen atom placed in finite space

Abstract: When a hydrogen atom trapped in finite space formed by two parallel perfectly conducting plates, the transition rates can be modified. Life-time of the hydrogen 2P 1/2 -state is estimated to be shorter as much as 56.3ps with a separation distance of b = 1.2µm between two plates. Although the modification is dependent on position of the atom, the life-time can be shorten or lengthen by adjusting the separation distance even for the case that the atom is placed at the center between two plates.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The photon propagator for plane parallel plates as given in this subsection had been used in [97] for the calculation of boundary dependent contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and in [98,99] for the calculation of boundary dependent level shifts of a hydrogen atom. It will be applied to calculate the radiative corrections to the Casimir force in Sec.4.5.…”
Section: The Photon Propagator In Plane Parallel Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photon propagator for plane parallel plates as given in this subsection had been used in [97] for the calculation of boundary dependent contributions to the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and in [98,99] for the calculation of boundary dependent level shifts of a hydrogen atom. It will be applied to calculate the radiative corrections to the Casimir force in Sec.4.5.…”
Section: The Photon Propagator In Plane Parallel Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if x , ify and if z may explicitly be written as (11) where we have further split the integrals into their radial I R ≡ ∞ 0 R * nf,lf (r)R ni,li (r)r 3 dr and angular (I θφx ≡ π 0 2π 0 Y * lf,mf Y li,mi sin(θ ) cos(φ) sin(θ ) dθ dφ, etc) components. Explicit formulae for the radial and angular integrals in ( 9), ( 10) and ( 11) may be then obtained using ( 4) and ( 6) respectively.…”
Section: Exact Non-integral State-to-state Transition Rate Formulaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a check on the validity of these expressions, they may be easily converted to their equivalent atomic counterparts. For example the decay rate for the n i = 2, l i = 1 → n f = 1, l f = 0 transition in hydrogen may be calculated using the present treatment by substituting parameter values relevant to this atomic transition yielding 6.2 × 10 8 s −1 compared to literature values [10,11] of 6.3 × 10 8 s −1 . Decay of the 'Rydberg' atomic hydrogen n i = 10, l i = 0 and n i = 10, l i = 1 states are more complicated because they involve addition of rates over a greater number of decay channels and also transitions involving other l and m values ( l = ±1 and m = 0, ±1).…”
Section: Exact Non-integral State-to-state Transition Rate Formulaementioning
confidence: 99%