2019
DOI: 10.1175/jas-d-18-0295.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of Potential Vorticity near the Tropopause by Nonconservative Processes in the ECMWF Model

Abstract: The upper-level potential vorticity (PV) structure plays a key role in the evolution of extratropical weather systems. PV is modified by nonconservative processes, such as cloud latent heating, radiative transfer, and turbulence. Using a Lagrangian method, material PV modification near the tropopause is attributed to specific parameterized processes in the global model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). In a case study, several flow features identified in a vertical section acro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(99 reference statements)
3
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing cross-tropopause transport in the UKMO model, Gray (2006) found similar results, with cloud and radiative processes being more important for STE than processes related to turbulence. In contrast, a recent study by Spreitzer et al (2019) shows that turbulent processes are mainly responsible for changing the PV around the tropopause in a ridge of an extratropical baroclinic wave. They used high-resolution ECMWF forecast data and conclude that turbulence is evident around the jet stream.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing cross-tropopause transport in the UKMO model, Gray (2006) found similar results, with cloud and radiative processes being more important for STE than processes related to turbulence. In contrast, a recent study by Spreitzer et al (2019) shows that turbulent processes are mainly responsible for changing the PV around the tropopause in a ridge of an extratropical baroclinic wave. They used high-resolution ECMWF forecast data and conclude that turbulence is evident around the jet stream.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For instance warm conveyor belts, i.e., airstreams ahead of cold fronts associated with extratropical cyclones in which strong diabatic heating by latent heat release occurs (e.g., Wernli and Davies, 1997), can reach the upper troposphere and modify the PV, consequently allowing for exchange between tropospheric and stratospheric air (Wirth, 1995;Wernli and Bourqui, 2002). According to Spreitzer et al (2019) clouds are more likely to change PV in regions with lower tropopause altitudes, e.g., in the trough. Similarly, rapid transfer from the boundary layer D. Kunkel et al: Mixing in the ExTL 12609 into the UTLS is evident in convective systems, which sometimes have the potential to overshoot into the stratosphere (e.g., Poulida et al, 1996;Stenchikov et al, 1996;Homeyer et al, 2014;Homeyer, 2015;Tang et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Spreitzer et al . (), who examined the influence of non‐conservative processes on the PV distribution at the tropopause, this term can be written as 1ρfalse(×bold-italicFi·θfalse)=1ρ{}×true(u̇v̇0)i·θ, where trueu̇=ufalse/t and truev̇=vfalse/t. Note that the momentum tendency F only contains horizontal components because the IFS model physics only impose changes to the u and v wind components.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Spreitzer et al . (), the accumulated PV tendency (APV) due to an individual process i along the trajectory x ( t ) can be computed by integrating PVR i over the trajectory from time t to t 0 , where t 0 is the start time of the backward trajectory: APVifalse[bold-italicxfalse(t0false),tfalse]=tt0PVRifalse[bold-italicxfalse(τfalse),τfalse]normaldτ. When evaluating subsection for each process, insight into the detailed modification of PV at the location x ( t 0 ) and time t 0 can be gained. The integral can be approximated by interpolating the hourly PVR fields onto the trajectory position and calculating the sum along the trajectory: APVifalse[bold-italicxfalse(t0false),tfalse]truek=0n1PVRifalse[bold-italicxfalse(tkfalse),tkfalse]normalΔt. The hourly values of PVR i are considered as representative for the previous hour and therefore the time step t n is not included in the summation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation