2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of platinum surfaces by spontaneous deposition: Methanol oxidation electrocatalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an effect has been noted for the electrooxidation of methanol using various electrode materials: initially Pt anodes and then more complex alloys and nanoparticles. Surface studies on Pt anodes showed that Pt is poisoned by adsorbed CO, which is formed as an intermediate during the electrooxidation process. , Combining Pt with a second metal improved the anode behavior, and systems utilizing the bimetallic RuPt anode proved to be particularly effective. This effect has been attributed to the “bi-functional mechanism” initially proposed by Watanabe and Motoo, in which Pt sites are responsible for the binding and dehydrogenation of methanol while Ru sites activate water through formation of Ru–oxo intermediates, which are then involved in conversion of surface-bound CO to CO 2 . …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such an effect has been noted for the electrooxidation of methanol using various electrode materials: initially Pt anodes and then more complex alloys and nanoparticles. Surface studies on Pt anodes showed that Pt is poisoned by adsorbed CO, which is formed as an intermediate during the electrooxidation process. , Combining Pt with a second metal improved the anode behavior, and systems utilizing the bimetallic RuPt anode proved to be particularly effective. This effect has been attributed to the “bi-functional mechanism” initially proposed by Watanabe and Motoo, in which Pt sites are responsible for the binding and dehydrogenation of methanol while Ru sites activate water through formation of Ru–oxo intermediates, which are then involved in conversion of surface-bound CO to CO 2 . …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The nature of the Ru species formed on Pt by spontaneous deposition was determined using commercial Pt/C [32] and only oxidized Ru species (RuO 2 and RuO x H y ) were found. Considering that the atomic hydrogen is not adsorbed on the Ru species [7], the Pt coverage (θ) in the Pt-Ru(Cu)/C electrocatalyst can be estimated according to the following equation [33]:…”
Section: Charge Of Cu Electrodeposition In the Synthesis Sequence Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MOR measurements revealed a maximum catalytic activity for Ru coverages about 0.10–0.40 on Ru-modified Pt (111) surfaces . The modified surfaces were mainly analyzed by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), ,, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), ,,, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). ,, Ru nanodeposits of 2–5 nm were detected as a result of the deposition step. ,,, XPS measurements showed the existence of Ru oxides as the main compounds in the modified electrocatalyst, ,,, which could be subject to further partial or complete reduction through a potential treatment , or remain on the electrocatalyst surface as nonreducible oxides. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spontaneous deposition has been mainly employed to modify the Pt low-index monocrystal surfaces to improve the MOR performance. ,, The deposition step has been typically performed using RuCl 3 as metal precursor and HClO 4 as acidic electrolyte, since sulfate/bisulfate anions are strongly adsorbed on Pt sites causing the inhibition of the process . MOR measurements revealed a maximum catalytic activity for Ru coverages about 0.10–0.40 on Ru-modified Pt (111) surfaces .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%