2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of membrane surfaces via microswelling for fouling control in drinking water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, membrane fouling during the separation process has inevitably hinders their practical applications, which is mainly caused by adsorption of living organisms, particulates or colloids [3,4]. Therefore, it is a significant scientific issue to improve the antifouling capability of polymeric membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, membrane fouling during the separation process has inevitably hinders their practical applications, which is mainly caused by adsorption of living organisms, particulates or colloids [3,4]. Therefore, it is a significant scientific issue to improve the antifouling capability of polymeric membranes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequence of these pronounced surface defects on membranes should not be neglected since it is unclear how these might contribute to the rate of bacterial adhesion and potentially the characteristics of the subsequent biofilm. This work provides a framework by which novel membranes with deliberate micro-topographical modification [25,27,28,[30][31][32], can be assessed from the point of view of early stage biofouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four reasons that could explain the performance enhancement of the PPy modified membrane in this study: (1) the hydrophilicity of the modified membrane was enhanced and this was good for membrane fouling mitigation during filtration; 26 (2) the roughness of the modified membrane was reduced, which also benefitted anti fouling of the membrane; 27 (3) narrow pore size distribution prevented foulants from entering the pores more effectively and further mitigate membrane fouling, 15,28 which enhanced the foulants rejection and reduced the turbidity of the effluent; (4) more negative charge on membrane surface inhibited the adsorption of negatively charged foulants on the membrane during filtration, 29,30 as the Zeta potential of yeast solution was -38.3 ± 0.41 mV 8 and the Zeta potential of the modified membrane surface was about -20 mV for pH 6 ∼ 8 (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Short-term Filtration Testsmentioning
confidence: 85%