Sediment Transport 2011
DOI: 10.5772/15041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of Mackinawite with L-Cysteine: Synthesis, Characterization, and Implications to Mercury Immobilization in Sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our earlier study, we observed that L-cysteine improved the mackinawite oxidation stability by 55% over unmodified mackinawite (Chaves et al, 2011). However, the effect of the modification on mercury-uptake capacity of mackinawite was not determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our earlier study, we observed that L-cysteine improved the mackinawite oxidation stability by 55% over unmodified mackinawite (Chaves et al, 2011). However, the effect of the modification on mercury-uptake capacity of mackinawite was not determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The characterization of the solids before Hg sorption was previously described by Chaves et al (2011). The solids after mercury sorption were analyzed by X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) using a Bruker/Siemens D5000 automated powder X-ray diffractometer with CuKα.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These protonations and deprotonations are quantitatively important, as disordered mackinawite has a high surface area of about 350 m 2 g À1 , with a total reactive-site density of 4.0 sites nm À2 (Wolthers et al, 2005). The E h of freshly precipitated mackinawite at pH 7.5 is $-300mV (Chaves et al, 2011). Given these properties, it is plausible that the reduction potential of disordered mackinawite could fall under alkaline conditions to the point that it could reduce CO 2 to CO (E 0 0 = -520mV), HCOOH (E 0 0 = -430mV), or formaldehyde (HCOOH + 2H + + 2e À 4 HCHO + H 2 O, E 0 0 = -580mV).…”
Section: Electron Bifurcation and Ion Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, if lipid membranes or simple protocells line the thin inorganic barriers (which have hydrophobic surfaces [75][76][77]), then the steepness of the proton gradient would depend on several factors: (i) the proton permeability of the wall itself; (ii) the flow rates through neighbouring pores (potentially some distance away); and (iii) the proton permeability of the lipid membrane lining the pore. It is feasible that the main barrier to proton flux -responsible for steepening natural pH gradients -is not the inorganic walls themselves but the lipid membranes lining and insulating them (Figure 1).…”
Section: Proton Flux Across Lipid Membranes and Through Protein Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%