2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.21525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of gene expression: Help to detect doping with erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), 0.77% for cells cultured in vitro (cluster IV), and 0.83% for nontumorous disease tissue and cells (cluster D). In the pool of the assessed SAGE catalogues, it ranged from 0.08% (total blood, GSM389907 [21]) to 4.36% of the total gene expression (bronchial epithelium, GSM125353 [22]). Of 492 human SAGE catalogues tested, the cumulative expression of the imprinted genes constituted >2% of the total gene expression in 21 and <0.2% in 7 catalogues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), 0.77% for cells cultured in vitro (cluster IV), and 0.83% for nontumorous disease tissue and cells (cluster D). In the pool of the assessed SAGE catalogues, it ranged from 0.08% (total blood, GSM389907 [21]) to 4.36% of the total gene expression (bronchial epithelium, GSM125353 [22]). Of 492 human SAGE catalogues tested, the cumulative expression of the imprinted genes constituted >2% of the total gene expression in 21 and <0.2% in 7 catalogues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, five genes remained differentially expressed even when high and microdoses were taken into account together in the study by Varlet-Marie et al 36 While these results were generated using SAGE and from only a few participants, they provide some confirmatory data to support the idea that gene expression profiles may provide a more sensitive method to detect microdoses of rHumanEPO, especially when the whole genome is interrogated. Therefore, a second study was funded by WADA and designed to use the genes significantly altered using a fairly high regimen of rHumanEPO injections discovered in the first study as primary detection candidates of microdosing with rHumanEPO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Therefore, if the gene expression profile following rHumanEPO administration yields a specific gene expression signature, this could lead to the development of new methods with potentially improved discriminatory power relative to current detection protocols. Some initial support for this hypothesis emerged in a WADA funded study by Varlet-Marie et al 36. Using the serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) method, Varlet-Marie et al identified 95 genes whose differential expression was subsequently tested by quantitative real-time PCR in two athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among several isoforms of UDPglucuronosyltransferase few are well known, viz.UGT1A6, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B7, UGT2B15 [21]. The UGT1A and UGT2B are responsible for glucuronidation of deferiprone [22]. Two variants,-2152 C>T and -275 T>A in the promoter of UGT1A9 gene are associated with the increased expression of UGT IA9.…”
Section: Deferipronementioning
confidence: 99%