2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of erbium photoluminescence decay rate due to ITO layers on thin films of SiO2:Er doped with Si-nanoclusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a long lifetime of the 4 I 13/2 metastable level makes the Er 3+ emission sensitive to nonradiative decay processes, such as upconversion and concentration quenching . Therefore, the possibility to control the excited state lifetime is of fundamental importance in the design of novel photonic devices based on Er-doped materials. Since the early work of Purcell, it is well-known that the variation of the local photonic density of states (LDOS) can modify the spontaneous emission properties of an emitter. On the other hand, the presence of a reflecting surface or a dielectric interface in the vicinity of the emitter modifies the free space boundary conditions and thus changes the photonic density of states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a long lifetime of the 4 I 13/2 metastable level makes the Er 3+ emission sensitive to nonradiative decay processes, such as upconversion and concentration quenching . Therefore, the possibility to control the excited state lifetime is of fundamental importance in the design of novel photonic devices based on Er-doped materials. Since the early work of Purcell, it is well-known that the variation of the local photonic density of states (LDOS) can modify the spontaneous emission properties of an emitter. On the other hand, the presence of a reflecting surface or a dielectric interface in the vicinity of the emitter modifies the free space boundary conditions and thus changes the photonic density of states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the significant emission rate increase that can be achieved by the presence of a planar interface, a considerable part of the radiatively emitted energy is subsequently dissipated by lossy surface waves or by evanescent PSPPs that, in the absence of proper additional out-coupling mechanisms, are to be considered nonradiative modes for the far-field. , Thus, the number of photons that reach the far-field can be even lower than in the case of emitters embedded in a homogeneous medium and the far-field quantum efficiency of the emitting system results seriously compromised. Since the increase of radiative decay rateswhile limiting nonradiative processesis the key for maximizing the irradiated energy, more complex systems have to be considered to overcome the limits of planar interfaces. A first step in this direction was carried out considering the effects of interface roughness in increasing the intensity and directivity of emission …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%