Organ and Species Specificity in Chemical Carcinogenesis 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-4400-1_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of DNA Repair Processes Induced by Nitrosamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enhanced removal of a6G from rat liver occurs after chronic administration ofdimethylnitrosamine (18,19), partial hepatectomy (20), or administration of hepatotoxins (10). This apparent induction of AAP activity is somewhat analogous to that demonstrated in E. coli, in which pretreatment with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine caused enhanced 06-methylguanine (m6G) removal and conferred resistance to mutagenesis (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Enhanced removal of a6G from rat liver occurs after chronic administration ofdimethylnitrosamine (18,19), partial hepatectomy (20), or administration of hepatotoxins (10). This apparent induction of AAP activity is somewhat analogous to that demonstrated in E. coli, in which pretreatment with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine caused enhanced 06-methylguanine (m6G) removal and conferred resistance to mutagenesis (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Storage at -80TC for several months prior to analysis could.have decreased the activity in the human samples, but rat liver samples stored under the same conditions lost <25% of their activity (unpublished observations). The system for repairing MeGua in DNA in E. coli is highly inducible in response to alkylating agents (28) and a much smaller increase (up to 3-fold) has been observed in rat liver in response to chronic exposure to various carcinogens and hepatotoxins (4,15,23,29). It is conceivable that the treatments received by the patients prior to death may have increased the human liver activity in some cases, but activities of all of the human samples tested were much-higher than those of the rat samples and the exposure to drugs differed greatly from one patient to another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is conceivable that the treatments received by the patients prior to death may have increased the human liver activity in some cases, but activities of all of the human samples tested were much-higher than those of the rat samples and the exposure to drugs differed greatly from one patient to another. Also, all of the factors known to induce the activity in rodent liver are hepatotoxic, leading to regenerative growth (4,15,23,29). It therefore is a reasonable conclusion that human liver has a substantially greater capacity than rodent liver to repair MeGua in DNA. The results given in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…06-Ethylguanine in ethylated DNA is apparently also repaired in this fashion in mammalian cells (119,120). No obvious or striking induction of the mammalian activity has been achieved by treatment of tissue culture cells with alkylating agents, however, and it is presently unclear if this methyltransferase can be induced in mammalian cells (121)(122)(123); P. Karran, unpublished information). The most intriguing property of the mammalian Q6-methylguanine methyltransferase is that it no longer seems active in some human tumors and tumor cell lines, in particular in lines fr om cells transformed with DNA tumor viruses, whereas normal diploid fi broblasts and other control cells express this repair fu nction (124)(125)(126).…”
Section: Tran Smethylase Fo R (J6-methylguaninementioning
confidence: 99%