2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of composite hardness models to incorporate indentation size effects in thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the coating hardness using noisy experimental results remains acceptable whether the diamond penetration depth is weak or strong. This result is contrary to the assertions generally found in the bibliography, which state that the JH model gives a poor fit when the indentation depth is shallower than the coating thickness or at the substrate-dominated end [14,15,[17][18][19][31][32][33]. This contradiction is due to an incorrect use of the model by these authors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation of the coating hardness using noisy experimental results remains acceptable whether the diamond penetration depth is weak or strong. This result is contrary to the assertions generally found in the bibliography, which state that the JH model gives a poor fit when the indentation depth is shallower than the coating thickness or at the substrate-dominated end [14,15,[17][18][19][31][32][33]. This contradiction is due to an incorrect use of the model by these authors.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…As underlined in the model presentation, it is necessary to take into account the hardness variation of the load without any simplifying hypotheses. Korsunsky et al [17,18] and Beegan et al [33] claim that this model is observed to break down when tested outside the range of experimental values. We show in a recent paper [34] that this affirmation is related to an erroneous application of this model, which is in contradiction to its physical meaning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Different reasons of this effect have been suggested depending on the structure of material. ISE was extensively investigated in terms of geometrically necessary dislocations and strain gradient plasticity for single-crystalline and polycrystalline materials [36][37][38], shear transformation zones and straininduced softening for metallic glasses [39], and effect of fracture on hardness for brittle materials like ceramics [40]. From more general aspect, the ISE was explained in term of energy balance consideration [40], friction between indenter and specimen characterized as surface-area-tovolume ratio [39], and contact dissipation energy associated with micro-scale asperities on the contact surface [41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important mechanical characteristics of metal films and coatings is microhardness, which is closely dependent on processing parameters used for their production [22,23]. Examining the mechanical response of a composite system constructed from substrate and film or coating on indentation and estimating the absolute film hardness independently from the substrate hardness include knowledge of parameters and phenomena such as type of the composite system [24], applied load, duration of the applied load at indentation (dwell time) and indentation depth [25,26], thickness of the coatings [27], elastic properties of the coatings [28], indentation size effect (ISE) [29][30][31][32], interfacial adhesion [33,34], etc. A large number of mathematical composite models have been developed so far to determine the "true" or absolute hardness of the film [27,[32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%