1999
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.46.1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students.

Abstract: Body image disturbance is both positively associated with the development of eating disorders and negatively associated with recovery. However, the aspects of body image most relevant to eating disorders have not been clearly established. Body image preoccupation may be particularly relevant to disordered eating. Yet, its measurement has proven problematic. In Study 1, a modification of the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ), a measure of body image preoccupation (P. J. Cooper, M. J. Taylor, Z. Cooper, & C. G. Fai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
130
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The BSQ-10-R was significantly correlated with the EAT (.74) and the BULIT-R (.77). In addition, the correlation between the original BSQ and the BSQ-10-R was .99 (Mazzeo, 1999), suggesting that the shortened version provided a comparable measure of body shape concern. …”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The BSQ-10-R was significantly correlated with the EAT (.74) and the BULIT-R (.77). In addition, the correlation between the original BSQ and the BSQ-10-R was .99 (Mazzeo, 1999), suggesting that the shortened version provided a comparable measure of body shape concern. …”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Within a sample of female undergraduates, Mazzeo (1999) reported high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .96). Cronbach's alpha in the current study was .97 (Time 1) and .96 (Time 2).…”
Section: Body Image Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Supporting the convergent validity of this instrument, Berland, Thompson, and Linton (1986), also using a clinical sample, demonstrated strong EAT-26 total score correlations with the EAT-40 and Eating Disorder Inventory, Drive for Thinness subscale (EDI; Garner, Olmsted, & Polivy, 1983), r = .90, .77, respectively. Furthermore, Mazzeo (1999) found the EAT-26 and the Bulimia Test-Revised (BULIT-R; Thelen, Farmer, Wonderlich, & Smith, 1991) total scores were highly correlated as well in a non-clinical sample (r = .79). Although the EAT-26 has been described as a measure of anorexia and bulimia, this inventory was not empirically validated in a non-clinical sample for these purposes until fairly recently.…”
Section: Measuring Disordered Eating Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%