2023
DOI: 10.3390/fire6100379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification and Comparison of Methods for Predicting the Moisture Content of Dead Fuel on the Surface of Quercus mongolica and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica under Rainfall Conditions

Tongxin Hu,
Linggan Ma,
Yuanting Gao
et al.

Abstract: The surface fine dead fuel moisture content (FFMC) is an important factor in predicting forest fire risk and is influenced by various meteorological factors. Many prediction methods rely on temperature and humidity as factors, resulting in poor model prediction accuracy under rainfall conditions. At the same time, there is an increasing number of methods based on machine learning, but there is still a lack of comparison with traditional models. Therefore, this paper selected the broad-leaved forest tree specie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The humus layer fuel was collected after removing any stones and dead branches. Following the method of Tongxin Hu et al [32], the collected samples were dried to absolute dryness to eliminate the influence of moisture content variability. After measuring the weight of the dried samples, data from all sampling points within each plot were aggregated, and the FFL for each plot was calculated on a per-unit-area basis.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The humus layer fuel was collected after removing any stones and dead branches. Following the method of Tongxin Hu et al [32], the collected samples were dried to absolute dryness to eliminate the influence of moisture content variability. After measuring the weight of the dried samples, data from all sampling points within each plot were aggregated, and the FFL for each plot was calculated on a per-unit-area basis.…”
Section: Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%