2005
DOI: 10.1002/mus.20343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke

Abstract: Unlike individuals with mild stroke, individuals with severe stroke are constrained to stereotypical movement patterns attributed to abnormal coupling of shoulder abductors with elbow flexors, and shoulder adductors with elbow extensors. Whether abnormal muscle coactivation and associated joint torque patterns can be changed in this population is important to determine given that it bears on the development of effective rehabilitation interventions. Eight subjects participated in a protocol that was designed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group and others have previously quantified abnormal muscle coactivations and joint torque-coupling patterns in both static (Dewald et al 1995;Beer et al 1999;Dewald and Beer 2001;Lum et al 2003) and dynamic (Beer et al 2000(Beer et al , 2004 protocols reflecting constraints in the ability of individuals with stroke to generate certain joint torque combinations (Twitchell 1951;Brunnstrom 1970). The mutability of abnormal muscle coactivation and joint torque-coupling has been addressed recently in studies attempting to change or remediate the impairment through eight weeks of physical interventions (Lum et al 2004;Ellis et al 2005). In this report, we pose the question of whether these abnormal patterns are affected by altering afferent somatosensory feedback resulting from changes in static limb configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our group and others have previously quantified abnormal muscle coactivations and joint torque-coupling patterns in both static (Dewald et al 1995;Beer et al 1999;Dewald and Beer 2001;Lum et al 2003) and dynamic (Beer et al 2000(Beer et al , 2004 protocols reflecting constraints in the ability of individuals with stroke to generate certain joint torque combinations (Twitchell 1951;Brunnstrom 1970). The mutability of abnormal muscle coactivation and joint torque-coupling has been addressed recently in studies attempting to change or remediate the impairment through eight weeks of physical interventions (Lum et al 2004;Ellis et al 2005). In this report, we pose the question of whether these abnormal patterns are affected by altering afferent somatosensory feedback resulting from changes in static limb configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Weakness dependent on joint position in subjects with hemiparesis was largely described for upper extremity 3,6 . Despite a large number of studies considering this question for upper extremities [6][7][8][9] , less attention has been given to describing the effect of joint position on lower limb force production after stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most studied abnormal neural synergy is the inability to simultaneously abduct the shoulder and extend the elbow [20][21][22][23]. While compensatory strategies (excessive trunk movement) can overcome this impairment, recovery of interjoint coordination is possible with a focused intervention [24]. Importantly, therapy strategies that promote relearning of normal interjoint coordination and movement kinematics may critically affect actual real-world use of the limb in ADLs [25], while therapies that allow use of compensatory strategies may impede this process [26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%