2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ModFOLD8: accurate global and local quality estimates for 3D protein models

Abstract: Methods for estimating the quality of 3D models of proteins are vital tools for driving the acceptance and utility of predicted tertiary structures by the wider bioscience community. Here we describe the significant major updates to ModFOLD, which has maintained its position as a leading server for the prediction of global and local quality of 3D protein models, over the past decade (>20 000 unique external users). ModFOLD8 is the latest version of the server, which combines the strengths of multiple pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C-score was used to measure the modeling confidence [53,54]. The top-ranked 3D structure was improved using ReFOLD (http: //www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ReFOLD/, accessed on 10 November 2020), a computational tool for model refinement guided by accurate quality estimates [55,56], and the structural precision was estimated using ModFold (https://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ModFOLD/, accessed on 20 November 2020), a server for global and local quality assessment [57]. The 3D model was further analyzed using Procheck's Ramachandran plot [58] and ProSA's Z-score plot [59,60].…”
Section: Template-based Protein Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-score was used to measure the modeling confidence [53,54]. The top-ranked 3D structure was improved using ReFOLD (http: //www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ReFOLD/, accessed on 10 November 2020), a computational tool for model refinement guided by accurate quality estimates [55,56], and the structural precision was estimated using ModFold (https://www.reading.ac.uk/bioinf/ModFOLD/, accessed on 20 November 2020), a server for global and local quality assessment [57]. The 3D model was further analyzed using Procheck's Ramachandran plot [58] and ProSA's Z-score plot [59,60].…”
Section: Template-based Protein Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tertiary structure prediction was made with AlphaFold 2.0 [ 16 ] with default settings and visualised with PyMOL v.2 [ 17 ]. The model quality assessment was performed with ProQ3D server ( accessed on 20 May 2021) [ 18 ] and ModFOLD8 server ( accessed on 25 May 2021) [ 19 ]. The predicted structure was superimposed with the HHpred highest-score fungal protease from Lecanicillium psalliotae sequence (PDB ID: 3F7M) using the functionality of PyMOL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the structure was predicted using AlphaFold 2.0 [45] with default settings, I-TASSER [46,47] with default settings, Phyre2 [32] in intensive modelling mode and Rosetta [48] using RoseTTAFold modelling mode [49]. The accuracy of prediction of the best-scoring models obtained by the methods listed above was estimated using ModFold8 [50], and the model with the highest global model quality score was used for the refinement of the structure using ReFOLD3 [51] in the next step. The quality of the prediction of the resulting structure was also estimated by ModFold8 [50].…”
Section: Protein Structure Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of prediction of the best-scoring models obtained by the methods listed above was estimated using ModFold8 [50], and the model with the highest global model quality score was used for the refinement of the structure using ReFOLD3 [51] in the next step. The quality of the prediction of the resulting structure was also estimated by ModFold8 [50]. Similar experimentally obtained structures were found by the HHpred [31], Phyre2 [32] and I-TASSER [47] servers.…”
Section: Protein Structure Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%