Japanese Management in the Low Growth Era 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-58257-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modes of Corporate Internationalization: Japanese FDI Strategies in Asia-Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To examine the influence of parent knowledge and expatriate ratio on subsidiary performance in both the short and the long terms, we used a 15‐year time series (1989–2003). We adopted this time window because it can take over ten years for Japanese subsidiaries to fully realize a return on their parents' investment (Biggadike, 1979; Tachiki, 1999). We limited our sample to those subsidiaries launched between 1989 and 1992 to minimize the potential bias caused by different economic conditions that were prevalent during the founding period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To examine the influence of parent knowledge and expatriate ratio on subsidiary performance in both the short and the long terms, we used a 15‐year time series (1989–2003). We adopted this time window because it can take over ten years for Japanese subsidiaries to fully realize a return on their parents' investment (Biggadike, 1979; Tachiki, 1999). We limited our sample to those subsidiaries launched between 1989 and 1992 to minimize the potential bias caused by different economic conditions that were prevalent during the founding period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used subsidiary performance in 1997 and 1999 as the performance measure for the period spanning 6–10 years, and those in 2001 and 2003 as the performance measure for the period spanning 11–15 years. We divided the long‐term time window at the point of ten years because parent resources invested in foreign subsidiaries might not be fully capitalized until after ten years (Biggadike, 1979; Fang et al., 2007; Tachiki, 1999). This ‘extended’ long‐term period (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to firms from other countries, Japanese firms may be more likely to exit later rather than earlier, making our result for Hypothesis 2a a conservative estimate. Japanese firms tend to refrain from exiting in the first few years of foreign operations (Delios & Beamish, 2001), given the long-term orientation and willingness of MNE parents to allow foreign subsidiaries a 5-to 10-year window to ''get set up'' abroad (Tachiki, 1999). Japan itself is moreover highly susceptible to natural disasters of various types and severities, such that a break-out of violent conflict elsewhere would perhaps pose less impact on Japanese MNEs than on counterparts from other countries that do not routinely undergo such experiential learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%