1992
DOI: 10.15184/s0896634600000492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modernization and Commercialization in the Tanzimat Period: 1838-1875

Abstract: The aim of the present study is to reconsider and reconstruct the economic history of the “decaying” Ottoman Empire during the Tanzimat period. Scores of scholars have already interpreted the decay in terms of imperial expansion. The decay paradigm is part of empire histories. Therefore, it is strongly imprinted with political discourse.Below, I will argue that the Ottoman case would be better understood if viewed within the context of a more dynamic process of change versus inertia rather than decay, and that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bureaucrats promoted reforms during the Tanzimat era (1839–1876) that shifted the ‘empire towards a more modern bureaucratic form, away from the patrimonial mix, and in tune with the models of modernity that were out in the international arena’ (Barkey 2016: 124; Toprak 1992).…”
Section: Situating the Ottoman Empire In The Capitalist World-economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bureaucrats promoted reforms during the Tanzimat era (1839–1876) that shifted the ‘empire towards a more modern bureaucratic form, away from the patrimonial mix, and in tune with the models of modernity that were out in the international arena’ (Barkey 2016: 124; Toprak 1992).…”
Section: Situating the Ottoman Empire In The Capitalist World-economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Considered a period of modernization and a divergence from traditional norms of planning and conservation in the Ottoman Empire, this modernization touched almost every dimension of the Ottoman Empire, aiming at structural differentiation, secularization, and urbanization. 35 The push for Tanzimat modernization led to the establishment of the first public display of the Ottoman Empire, housed at the former Church of Hagia Irene, which had been integrated with the Topkapı Palace Complex as the imperial armory. With the rearrangement of Hagia Irene into the House of Antiquities and Weaponry in 1846, the Sultanahmet district first encountered the notion of museum, and of musealization as a potentially transformative process.…”
Section: Sultanahmet District As the Public Face Of Istanbul's Historic Peninsulamentioning
confidence: 99%