1939
DOI: 10.2307/3438441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern penningteori

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In natural history, this problem came back as late as in 1963, when Edward Lorenz examined the model of the Earth atmosphere using numerical methods [21]. However, a Swedish economist, Palander, had come up against this phenomenon back in the 1930s while analysing duopoly and oligopoly models [22,23]. Similar observations were made at the beginning of the 1950s while examining Goodwin's business cycle model [24].…”
Section: Bidirectional Relations Between Economics and Physicsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In natural history, this problem came back as late as in 1963, when Edward Lorenz examined the model of the Earth atmosphere using numerical methods [21]. However, a Swedish economist, Palander, had come up against this phenomenon back in the 1930s while analysing duopoly and oligopoly models [22,23]. Similar observations were made at the beginning of the 1950s while examining Goodwin's business cycle model [24].…”
Section: Bidirectional Relations Between Economics and Physicsmentioning
confidence: 64%