1994
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.1994.9939092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Medicine, Homosexuality, and the Bible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beal (1994) addresses several major concerns that Bible advocates highlight as proof of the immorality of homosexuality and answers them with a different interpretation. He contends that committed gay relationships are equally as able to fulfill "God's design for creation" (p. 93).…”
Section: The Strugglementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beal (1994) addresses several major concerns that Bible advocates highlight as proof of the immorality of homosexuality and answers them with a different interpretation. He contends that committed gay relationships are equally as able to fulfill "God's design for creation" (p. 93).…”
Section: The Strugglementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Religious involvement usually means an external orientation with an external authority, which is often associated with Western traditions like Christianity, Judaism, and the Bible. It is from these institutions that homosexuality has come to be viewed as immoral and sinful (Barret & Barzan, 1996;Beal, 1994;Brooke, 1993;Court & Whitehead, 1996;Wagner et al, 1994).…”
Section: The Strugglementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, for example, characterizations of the crime of zoophilia abound in numerous current analyses (Aggrawal 2009), although they are often limited to the legal and religious consequences derived from that offence. Beal (1994, p. 92) relates this practice to gender politics only anecdotally, elucidating a link between sexual relations with animals and lesbianism. In line with both Haddox (2010), who notes the need to follow up on studies of biblical masculinity based on its intersection with other disciplines, and the posthumanist current developed by Wolfe that cultural transcriptions derive not only from humans but all living beings that may “count as a subject of ethical address” (2010, p. 29), it is worth enriching the interpretation of the social constructions of gender present in the Holy Scriptures by complementing it with animal studies and thus demonstrate how intimate contact between species in ancient cultures is amenable to building another parameter for measuring the masculinity or femininity of figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%