2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-02238-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Image Quality Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 475 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TPDM has been compared with seven state-of-the-art metrics, i.e., the Hausdorff distance (HD) [6,11], the root mean squared error (RMS ) [6,11], 3DW P M 1 and 3DW P M 2 [22], MSDM2 [32], DAME [37] and F M P D [38]. The coherence between the objective values produced by the MVQ metrics and the mean opinion scores (M OS) provided by subjective databases is measured using two different correlation kinds: The Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC or r p ), which measures the prediction accuracy of the objective metrics, and the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC or r s ), which measures the prediction monotonicity [19,34]. Before computing the correlation values, especially the PLCC , it is recommended to conduct a psychometric fitting between the objective scores and the M OS values, in order to partially remove the non-linearity between them.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TPDM has been compared with seven state-of-the-art metrics, i.e., the Hausdorff distance (HD) [6,11], the root mean squared error (RMS ) [6,11], 3DW P M 1 and 3DW P M 2 [22], MSDM2 [32], DAME [37] and F M P D [38]. The coherence between the objective values produced by the MVQ metrics and the mean opinion scores (M OS) provided by subjective databases is measured using two different correlation kinds: The Pearson linear correlation coefficient (PLCC or r p ), which measures the prediction accuracy of the objective metrics, and the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC or r s ), which measures the prediction monotonicity [19,34]. Before computing the correlation values, especially the PLCC , it is recommended to conduct a psychometric fitting between the objective scores and the M OS values, in order to partially remove the non-linearity between them.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although during the last decade we have seen tremendous advance in objective image visual quality assessment [19,34], the research on objective mesh visual quality (MVQ) assessment is still at its early stage, with very few metrics proposed [39]. A possible way to evaluate the perceptual quality of 3D meshes is to apply image quality metrics on 2D images generated through 3D model rendering under several pre-selected viewing positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, objective quality assessment algorithms can be classified according to the availability of an original (distortion-free) image, with which the distorted image is to be compared. Fullreference (FR) methods [8], [12], [14]- [16] directly compare the received and the undistorted (reference) images. In spite of their accuracy [12], [13], FR methods prove impractical when the reference image is unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their accuracy [12], [13], FR methods prove impractical when the reference image is unavailable. No-reference (NR) methods [8], [16], [17]- [20] can assess perceived quality without any information about the original image, but are usually targeted to a predefined set of distortions, and therefore their applicability is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation