2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern human teeth from Late Pleistocene Luna Cave (Guangxi, China)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying the same approach to the extant M and N lineages, which comprise all the mtDNA diversity in the rest of the world, gave a coalescence date of around 50–65 kya that has been considered as the time frame for the out of Africa dispersal of modern humans [24, 25]. These phylogenetic inferences are at odds with dates obtained from the fossil record that point to the presence of modern humans around 100 kya in the Levant [26], and in southern China [11, 2729]. The usual genetic explanation for this discrepancy is that these fossils have not left any genetic contribution to extant humans at least from a mtDNA maternal perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the same approach to the extant M and N lineages, which comprise all the mtDNA diversity in the rest of the world, gave a coalescence date of around 50–65 kya that has been considered as the time frame for the out of Africa dispersal of modern humans [24, 25]. These phylogenetic inferences are at odds with dates obtained from the fossil record that point to the presence of modern humans around 100 kya in the Levant [26], and in southern China [11, 2729]. The usual genetic explanation for this discrepancy is that these fossils have not left any genetic contribution to extant humans at least from a mtDNA maternal perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent paleogenetic discoveries of limited introgression in the genome of non-African modern humans, of genetic material from archaic, Neanderthal [3, 4] and Denisovan [57] hominins has been solved adding a modest archaic assimilation note to the replacement statement [8]. In the East Asia region however, the alternative hypothesis of a continuous regional evolution of modern humans from archaic populations is supported by the slow evolution of its Paleolithic archaeological record [9] and the irrefutable presence of early and fully modern humans in China at least since 80 kya [1012]. Moreover, recently it has been detected ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals from the Altai Mountains in Siberia at roughly 100 kya [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extreme rainfall with storms were also recorded in the cave deposit of Shuijinggong Cave in Guangxi during MIS5a (Zhang et al, 2013), supporting our assumption of intense rainfall at this interval. It is worth noting that this sudden shift occurred during the hominin occupation of Luna Cave (127-70 ka; Bae et al, 2014) and almost coincide with the presence of hominin in Huanglong Cave (101-81 ka; Shen et al, 2013) and Fuyan (120-80 ka; Liu et al, 2015). It is worth noting that this sudden shift occurred during the hominin occupation of Luna Cave (127-70 ka; Bae et al, 2014) and almost coincide with the presence of hominin in Huanglong Cave (101-81 ka; Shen et al, 2013) and Fuyan (120-80 ka; Liu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Multidecadal and Long-term Rainfall Variations During Mis5a/mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeological evidences indicate that southern China is a key region of modern human evolution and dispersal (Bae et al, 2014(Bae et al, , 2017Cai et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2015). Archaeological evidences indicate that southern China is a key region of modern human evolution and dispersal (Bae et al, 2014(Bae et al, , 2017Cai et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%