Pesticides in the Modern World - Trends in Pesticides Analysis 2011
DOI: 10.5772/17312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Extraction Techniques for Pesticide Residues Determination in Plant and Soil Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be observed that the standard SPE cartridge (C 18 ) showed a disparity in extraction efficiency and was the least cartridge compared with Ch-CuO NPs and Ch-ZnO NPs in the recovery of most tested pesticides including abamectin (recovery of 48.11-97.59%), fenamiphos (recovery of 78.60-84.20%), imidacloprid (recovery of 31.20-80.16%), lambda-cyhalothrin (recovery of 51.70-93.88%), and methomyl (recovery of 23.35-40.37%). Unfortunately, the SPE has certain limitations, primarily related to low recovery, i.e., slightly lower sensitivity, in cases where the SPE column is blocked (blocking the absorption centers by the sample's solid and organic components) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed that the standard SPE cartridge (C 18 ) showed a disparity in extraction efficiency and was the least cartridge compared with Ch-CuO NPs and Ch-ZnO NPs in the recovery of most tested pesticides including abamectin (recovery of 48.11-97.59%), fenamiphos (recovery of 78.60-84.20%), imidacloprid (recovery of 31.20-80.16%), lambda-cyhalothrin (recovery of 51.70-93.88%), and methomyl (recovery of 23.35-40.37%). Unfortunately, the SPE has certain limitations, primarily related to low recovery, i.e., slightly lower sensitivity, in cases where the SPE column is blocked (blocking the absorption centers by the sample's solid and organic components) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of pesticides 2.8.1. Extraction procedure A number of methods currently exist for the extraction and analysis of multi-residue pesticides from a variety of food matrices [24]. We employed the mini-Luke (multi-residue) method using acetone, dichloromethane and petroleum ether mixture (1:1:1) for the extraction of pesticide residues.…”
Section: Optical Emission Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty active substances in pesticides were selected for the research (including a number of metabolites), with the substances belonging to different chemical groups (neonicotinoids, tryasols, imidazoles, pyrethroids, organophosphorus compounds, strobilurins, etc.) [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Multi-residual Methods To Determine Pesticides In Agricultural Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the original method QuEChERS [ 15 , 16 ] is only slightly different from the main procedure being applied at present to matrices with the low (2–20%) or high (>20%) fat content. The main difference is in the purification stage since even a small amount of fat is also co-extracted from the matrix and can affect the subsequent chromatographic analysis [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Multi-residual Methods To Determine Pesticides In Agricultural Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%