Forest Inventory
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4381-3_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Data Acquisition for Forest Inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating structural data in resemblance assessments would allow the analyst to exploit valuable information obtained during field surveys (e.g. Holopainen & Kalliovirta ). If available, there is no reason to ignore the wealth of information regarding size when measuring community resemblance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating structural data in resemblance assessments would allow the analyst to exploit valuable information obtained during field surveys (e.g. Holopainen & Kalliovirta ). If available, there is no reason to ignore the wealth of information regarding size when measuring community resemblance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst other modern forest inventory methods (Holopainen & Kalliovirta 2006), total stations combining electronic theodolite, electronic distance measuring device and computer with specialized software have recently been implemented. It enables spatially exact determination of the position of e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data collection by conventional ground measurements is the most expensive, time-consuming, and labor-intensive stage in the forest planning process (Trotter et al, 1997;Eler, 2001;Teremit et al, 2005;Demirel and Özkan, 2018;Kanja et al, 2019). Therefore, terrestrial photogrammetry and optic remote sensing (RS) products such as multicameras, aerial photos, and satellite images have been widely utilized for estimations of forests' structural characteristics in combination with ground measurements both in Turkey (Demirel and Özkan, 2018;Günlü and Kadıoğulları, 2018;Çil et al, 2015;Bulut et al, 2016;Kanja et al, 2019;Sakici and Günlü, 2018;Yilmaz and Güngör, 2019) and in the world (Ozdemir and Karnieli, 2011;Holopainen and Kalliovirta, 2006;Forsman et al, 2016;Surovy et al, 2016;Ucar et al, 2018). Nevertheless, the estimations based on optic RS hardly meet the requirements for accuracy in FI studies compared with conventional ground measurements (Holopainen and Kalliovirta, 2006;Sefercik and Atesoglu, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%