2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.11.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern chromatographic and mass spectrometric techniques for protein biopharmaceutical characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
112
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
0
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for high resolution separation prior to MS is essential where multiple proteoforms of biopharmaceuticals, some of which are isobaric or differ by only 1 or a few Daltons and/or are in low abundance. Efforts are being made to develop LC columns suitable for high resolution intact protein separation [228]. At the same time, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) represents an alternative and complementary separation approach based on charge and hydrodynamic volume, with the potential for ultra-high efficiency [229][230][231].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for high resolution separation prior to MS is essential where multiple proteoforms of biopharmaceuticals, some of which are isobaric or differ by only 1 or a few Daltons and/or are in low abundance. Efforts are being made to develop LC columns suitable for high resolution intact protein separation [228]. At the same time, capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) represents an alternative and complementary separation approach based on charge and hydrodynamic volume, with the potential for ultra-high efficiency [229][230][231].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iologics or biopharmaceutical products have seen an exponential growth, in terms of both scientific interest and market value, which is essentially driven by developments in the field of biosimilars and novel biopharmaceuticals [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Owing to the inherent complexity of biomacromolecules, the physicochemical characterization of biologics poses an analytical challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, comprehensive structural and functional characterization is a prerequisite to determine the quality, as it directly affects the product efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. Amongst the physicochemical attributes, aggregation, charge heterogeneity, sequence variants, posttranslational modifications, and process-induced chemical modifications are critical to monitoring, and are done utilizing state-of-art analytical techniques [3,[7][8][9][10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of biologics attributes and the implementation of QbD strategies demand a multi-attribute method (MAM) that can monitor multiple biologics PQAs at the molecular level in a single assay. Coupling liquid chromatography (LC) to high resolution and high accuracy mass spectrometry (MS) techniques, LC-MS based peptide mapping has become a MAM approach that can identify and quantify multiple attributes of biologics simultaneously at the molecular level [6,7,11,12], as well as elucidate the mechanisms associated with degradation [7,13,14]. In a typical MAM workflow, therapeutic protein samples are denatured and reduced to break disulfide bonds between the cysteine residues, which are then alkylated by iodoacetamide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical methods to identify and quantify these PQAs, especially CQAs, are essential for the development of QTPP and implementation of control strategies. Conventionally, a panel of analytical techniques such as size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), ion-exchange chromatography (IEX), hydrophobic-interaction chromatography (HIC), or capillary electrophoresis (CE) is typically used to monitor product quality consistency as well as product variants and impurities at the intact protein level [7][8][9]. Although these chromatographic and electrophoretic methods widely are used as release assays for biologics [10], they cannot directly monitor biologically relevant PQAs at the molecular level, which does not align with QbD principles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%