Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery XXIII 2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2220290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern approaches in deep learning for SAR ATR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This section reviews some of the relevant studies in this area. Many authors applied CNN to SAR ATR and tested on MSTAR dataset, e.g., [43][44][45][46], etc.…”
Section: B Interpretation Of Sar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section reviews some of the relevant studies in this area. Many authors applied CNN to SAR ATR and tested on MSTAR dataset, e.g., [43][44][45][46], etc.…”
Section: B Interpretation Of Sar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan et al [31] proposed an architecture of three convolutional layers, following a fully connected layer of Softmax as a classifier, increasing the accuracy to 92.3%. Moreover, Wilmanski et al [32] explored different learning algorithms of training CNNs, finding that the AdaDelta technique that can update the various learning rates of hyper-parameters outperformed the other techniques such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and AdaGrad. Recently, in [24], a five-layer all-convolutional network was proposed.…”
Section: Sar Target Recognition With Cnnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CNN architecture modified from Wilmanski et al [3] is selected as a baseline to compare with the proposed method. The differences between the baseline and the original Wilmanski's network are a size of input image and kernel sizes of three convolutional layers.…”
Section: Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several classification approaches have already been proposed in SAR ATR. Wilmanski et al applied convolutional neural network (CNN) to SAR classification problem and showed promising results of high accuracy [3]. The method achieved 97 % in accuracy while manual feature based classifiers showed approximately 70 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%