2014
DOI: 10.12789/geocanj.2014.41.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Analytical Facilities 2. A Review of Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Procedures for Lithogeochemical Data

Abstract: SUMMARYQuality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) are critical components of modern analytical geochemistry. A properly constructed QA/QC program identifies both the source of analytical error and provides a means of establishing confidence in and assessing limitations of analytical data. A QA/QC program involves monitoring precision, accuracy, and potential contamination from sampling to analysis. Precision can be monitored via the systematic insertion of sample, pulp, and analytical duplicates, and refere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most errors associated with mass balance calculations are due to: (1) sampling and analytical errors; (2) erroneous precursor selection; and (3) the mobility of elements normally considered immobile. Analytical errors are easily avoidable with modern procedures and good practices [61], although performing representative sampling is more challenging [30,31] (Section 2.2).…”
Section: Errors Precursors and Immobile Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most errors associated with mass balance calculations are due to: (1) sampling and analytical errors; (2) erroneous precursor selection; and (3) the mobility of elements normally considered immobile. Analytical errors are easily avoidable with modern procedures and good practices [61], although performing representative sampling is more challenging [30,31] (Section 2.2).…”
Section: Errors Precursors and Immobile Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QA was performed on the NHM's in-house standard, with accuracy and precision data given in Table A.1. Accuracy and precision are defined as excellent for all elements (Piercey, 2014). Only the six PGM with an analytical total of 100 ± 3 are presented, with the rest of the data treated as semi-quantitative.…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision and accuracy of the analyses were determined using duplicates and reference materials following methods described in Jenner (1996) and Piercey (2014). The reference materials utilized in the study included three different organic-and/or sulfide-rich shales (SCO-1, SDO-1, and SGR1b) and one iron formation (FeR-1).…”
Section: Sampling Methods and Quality Control And Assurancementioning
confidence: 99%