2017
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1338587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderators, mediators and nonspecific predictors of outcome after cognitive rehabilitation of executive functions in a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: The majority of treatment effects were nonspecific to intervention, probably underscoring the variables' general contribution to outcome of cognitive rehabilitation interventions. Interventions targeting specific cognitive domains, such as attention or working memory, need to take into account the patients' overall cognitive and emotional self-perceived functioning. Future studies should investigate the identified predictors further, and also consider other predictor candidates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identifying more precisely who are at relatively greater risk for relapse and targeting those individuals with maintenance intervention would be a cost-effective strategy. For the time being, we have limited knowledge about which interventions and intervention mechanisms work best for whom, when in the course of recovery, and under what conditions (Tornås et al, 2017).…”
Section: Maintenance Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying more precisely who are at relatively greater risk for relapse and targeting those individuals with maintenance intervention would be a cost-effective strategy. For the time being, we have limited knowledge about which interventions and intervention mechanisms work best for whom, when in the course of recovery, and under what conditions (Tornås et al, 2017).…”
Section: Maintenance Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our sample was larger than that of other rehabilitation studies (e.g. Giummarra et al, 2018;Stamenova & Levine, 2019;Tornås et al, 2019), it was still rather modest considering that we conducted moderation analyses in a multilevel setting. Therefore, our results should be considered as hypothesis-generating findings that can be further investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Due to this overall rather limited effect, we decided to investigate possible moderators of the treatment. In addition to examining an intervention's effectiveness, the question of potential moderators, that is, what works best for whom, is a key aspect of intervention research (Grawe, 1997(Grawe, , 2004Kraemer et al, 2002;Tornås et al, 2019). Knowledge of patient characteristics that moderate treatment outcomes could help personalise psychosocial rehabilitation treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a PubMed literature search (predictor, prognosis, cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, and brain injury), yielding only 16 studies, of which two were relevant ( Rosti-Otajärvi et al, 2013 ; Tornås et al, 2019 ). There are no studies on predictive factors on attention training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%