2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11174619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderating Effects of the Timing of Reward Determination and Performance Standards between Rewards and Self-Efficacy for Sustainable Intrinsic Motivation

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine the moderating effects of the timing of reward determination and performance standards on the relationship between pay-for-performance and self-efficacy. It is an experimental study; the sample included 352 participants from Amazon Mechanical Turk, and an online experiment was conducted on an external website. The model was tested for mediation and moderation processes using regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results showed a mediating effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to rewarding the students using bonus marks, this study confirmed the positive impact found by other studies regarding promoting self-efficacy (e.g., Park & Yang, 2019;Zhang, Zhang, Liu, & Du, 2019) and motivation (Miendlarzewska, Bavelier, & Schwartz, 2016).…”
Section: What Features Within the Framework Promoted Improved Students' Self-efficacy Andsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In regards to rewarding the students using bonus marks, this study confirmed the positive impact found by other studies regarding promoting self-efficacy (e.g., Park & Yang, 2019;Zhang, Zhang, Liu, & Du, 2019) and motivation (Miendlarzewska, Bavelier, & Schwartz, 2016).…”
Section: What Features Within the Framework Promoted Improved Students' Self-efficacy Andsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Working hard to gain bonus marks is considered an important extrinsic motivational approach for the students as it helps to improve the students' learning skills (Miendlarzewska, Bavelier, and Schwartz, 2016). Using bonus marks improves students' motivation and selfefficacy (Stirin Tzur, Ganzach, & Pazy, 2016;Park & Yang, 2019;Zhang, Zhang, Liu, & Du, 2019).…”
Section: Mathematics Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arguments are consistent with empirical evidence that points out that when employees perceive a strong link to the performance reward system, they perceive themselves to have more autonomy [7,13]. In particular, rewards that effectively recognize effort and performance may increase the sense of competence and self-efficacy, which are both directly related to intrinsic motivation [7,26]. In addition, rewards that give rise to volitional behavior, avoiding imposing performance standards and putting pressure on them to meet those expectations, may increase autonomy and, thus, intrinsic motivation [5,23].…”
Section: Pay For Performance Satisfaction and Intrinsic Motivationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Seen in Model 2 of Table 2, the coefficient of this moderation effect is significant (β = 0.15, p < 0.01). Figure 2a depicts the interaction plot [45]. A simple slope test indicates that when coworker support is low, abusive supervision is negatively related to the subordinate's task performance (−1 SD; b = −0.24, t = −2.96, p < 0.01), but when coworker support is high it is not significantly related to task performance (+1 SD; b = −0.01, t = 0.10, p = 0.92).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood and Bandura [44] suggested that self-efficacy influences one's perception of the current condition and the selection, implementation, and persistence of action. Likewise, many scholars have asserted that self-efficacy incites the desire to accomplish, reduces stress, lowers negative emotions such as depression, and improves individual accomplishment and well-being [45][46][47][48][49]. Self-efficacy is a specific cognitive resource that could decrease the effects of abusive supervision.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Coworker Support and Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%