Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention

Engaging in Pro-Environment Travel Behaviour Research from a Psycho-Social Perspective: A Review of Behavioural Variables and Theories

“…Taking the example of NAT applications, some researchers measured the various model variables on a general level [49,92], while others measured them on a specific level [33,93,122]. Pronello and Camusso [35] used both specific and general attitudes to segment the market.…”

“…The rationale is that pro-social behaviour depends on the activation of personal moral norms, which are triggered once individuals expect a negative outcome to a given situation (problem awareness [PA] and adverse consequences [AC]) and when they believe their action may have a role in reducing this threat (ascription of responsibility [AR]). It seems that there is confusion among researchers about how to interpret the causal relationship between the variables: at least three approaches have been proposed in the literature to deal with such variables: (1) the relationship between Personal Norms (PN) and Behaviour is moderated by Problem Awareness (PA) and Ascription of Responsibility (AR) [90,91]; (2) Problem Awareness (PA) influences Ascription of Responsibility (AR), which in turn influences Personal Norms (PN) and PN influence behaviour [32,49,92,93]; (3) both Problem Awareness (PA) and Ascription of Responsibility (AR) influence PN, while PN, in turn, influence behaviour [67,94]. The first interpretation refers to a moderator model, while the other two interpretations imply a causal or mediation model.…”

Inzicht in consumentenkeuze voor sierteelt : Kennisintegratiedocument PPS Consument, Keuzearchitectuur en Communicatie voor Sierteeltproducten

“…• attitude tegenover duurzame bloemen (Ajzen, 1991) • persoonlijke norm met betrekking tot duurzame bloemen (Gärling et al, 2003) • subjectieve kennis duurzame bloemen (Flynn en Goldsmith, 1999) • descriptieve norm duurzame bloemen (Ajzen, 1991) • ervaren gedragscontrole duurzame bloemen (Ajzen, 1991) LEI Nota 2016-015 | 27…”

Incorporating governance influences into social-ecological system models: a case study involving biodiversity conservation

“…In this research these are behaviours associated with protecting and managing the lowland native grasslands. These drivers, in addition to enterprise profitability and other financial considerations, influence landholder engagement in pro-conservation practices (shown by the network of arrows pointing to this driver in Figure 2), and proenvironmental behaviour more broadly (Gärling et al 2003;Pannell et al 2006). Emtage and Herbohn (2012) and Morrison et al (2011) detail the following landholder attributes as drivers of pro-environmental behaviours, which are similar to those identified in this study: the presence and extent of landholder networks (both formal and informal); approaches to seeking information; economic and lifestyle motivations; level of entrepreneurship and innovation; time constraints and prioritisation; and the levels of trust between landholders and agencies providing conservation programs.…”