1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6238(98)00024-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderate to heavy caffeine consumption during pregnancy and relationship to spontaneous abortion and abnormal fetal growth: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
48
0
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
48
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our results should be interpreted with caution in consideration of methodological limitations of the original studies and other potential issues such as residual confounding and publication bias that may have influenced our results. Most previous reviews on maternal caffeine intake and pregnancy loss included only a qualitative summary of the evidence (17,48,49) , used estimates that were not adjusted for potential confounders (50) or included only five studies on preconception caffeine intake (51) . A recent meta-analysis reported significant associations stronger than those observed in our meta-analysis between higher maternal caffeine intakes and higher risks of miscarriage (summary RR = 1·14 per 100 mg caffeine/d, 95 % CI 1·10, 1·19 in that study compared with 1·08, 95 % CI 1·04, 1·13 in our study) and stillbirth (summary RR = 1·19, 95 % CI 1·05, 1·35 in that study compared with 1·09, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·16 in our study) (18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our results should be interpreted with caution in consideration of methodological limitations of the original studies and other potential issues such as residual confounding and publication bias that may have influenced our results. Most previous reviews on maternal caffeine intake and pregnancy loss included only a qualitative summary of the evidence (17,48,49) , used estimates that were not adjusted for potential confounders (50) or included only five studies on preconception caffeine intake (51) . A recent meta-analysis reported significant associations stronger than those observed in our meta-analysis between higher maternal caffeine intakes and higher risks of miscarriage (summary RR = 1·14 per 100 mg caffeine/d, 95 % CI 1·10, 1·19 in that study compared with 1·08, 95 % CI 1·04, 1·13 in our study) and stillbirth (summary RR = 1·19, 95 % CI 1·05, 1·35 in that study compared with 1·09, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·16 in our study) (18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, studies have reached mixed conclusions, in part because of difficulties measuring caffeine intake, but also because of other clinical influences on fetal growth and birth outcomes [4][5][6]. Only one randomised controlled trial of caffeine reduction during pregnancy has been conducted to date, concluding that "moderate reductions" in caffeine intake (of around 200mg) do not substantially alter birthweight or length of gestation [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces deux substances sont des métabolites de la caféine, obtenus après ingestion de café correspondant à une dose de 300 mg de caféine. Le café est un produit qui s'avère être non toxique même à dose élevée, il n'a pas de contre-indication et l'expression du phénotype de la caféine n'est pas influencée par l'âge, ni par le sexe [38][39][40]. Le choix de ce test est basé sur son utilisation simple, sa sécurité relative [33,[41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified