2010
DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-7-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moderate energy restriction with high protein diet results in healthier outcome in women

Abstract: BackgroundThe present study compares two different weight reduction regimens both with a moderately high protein intake on body composition, serum hormone concentration and strength performance in non-competitive female athletes.MethodsFifteen normal weighted women involved in recreational resistance training and aerobic training were recruited for the study (age 28.5 ± 6.3 yr, height 167.0 ± 7.0 cm, body mass 66.3 ± 4.2 kg, body mass index 23.8 ± 1.8, mean ± SD). They were randomized into two groups. The 1 KG… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, resistance and aerobic training have been shown to attenuate the loss of lean mass during energy deficit when compared to energy restriction alone (Kraemer et al, 1999; Miller et al, 2013), which were both also used during the diet by the present fitness competitors. Moreover, the changes in body weight of the diet group were rather slow, on average ~0.4 g/kg per week, which is actually pretty close to the level that was previously observed to maintain lean mass in normal-weight females on a diet (Mero et al, 2010) and what has been recommended for fat loss in fitness diets (Helms et al, 2014). The average participant, while resistance trained, had not had many years of training experience (average 3.5 ± 1.4 years in the diet group and 3.1 ± 1.2 years in the controls), which makes it possible for some to even gain some muscle mass on a diet when regularly conducting resistance training combined with high protein intake (Josse et al, 2011; Longland et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Third, resistance and aerobic training have been shown to attenuate the loss of lean mass during energy deficit when compared to energy restriction alone (Kraemer et al, 1999; Miller et al, 2013), which were both also used during the diet by the present fitness competitors. Moreover, the changes in body weight of the diet group were rather slow, on average ~0.4 g/kg per week, which is actually pretty close to the level that was previously observed to maintain lean mass in normal-weight females on a diet (Mero et al, 2010) and what has been recommended for fat loss in fitness diets (Helms et al, 2014). The average participant, while resistance trained, had not had many years of training experience (average 3.5 ± 1.4 years in the diet group and 3.1 ± 1.2 years in the controls), which makes it possible for some to even gain some muscle mass on a diet when regularly conducting resistance training combined with high protein intake (Josse et al, 2011; Longland et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…As a consequence, hypertrophic pathways may be impaired. Therefore, we would follow previous suggestions to losẽ 0.5 kg of body mass per week in order to promote body mass reduction without activating catabolic pathways [20,21], which seems to be attainable with a caloric restriction of 300-750 kcal per day [21]. This reduction in caloric intake should be accompanied by a protein intake of around 1.2 to 2.0 g/kg, as has been previously suggested for bodybuilders [6,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By manipulating the length of contest preparation (and, therefore, the rate of weight loss), the size of the energy deficit can be modified to influence the degree of acute Journal of Human Kinetics -volume 71/2020 http://www.johk.pl relative energy deficiency. For example, Mero et al (2010) investigated the effects of two different rates of weight loss in recreationally trained females on protein-matched (1.4 g/kg) diets. One group was assigned to lose 1 kg per week (with an energy deficit of 1100 kcal/day), while the other was assigned to lose 0.5 kg per week (with an energy deficit of 550 kcal/day).…”
Section: Competition Preparation Length Of Contest Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%