Moderate aerobic exercise, but not anticipation of exercise, improves cognitive control

Abstract

Background Evidence suggests a single bout of exercise can improve cognitive control. However, many studies only include assessments after exercise. It is unclear whether exercise changes as a result, or in anticipation, of exercise. Objective To examine changes in cognitive control due to moderate aerobic exercise, and anticipation of such exercise. Methods Thirty-one young healthy adults (mean age 22 years; 55% women) completed three conditions (randomized order): 1) exercise (participants anticipated and completed exercise); 2) anticipation (participants anticipated exercise but completed rest); and 3) rest (participants anticipated and completed rest). Cognitive control was assessed with a modified Flanker task at three timepoints: (1) early (20 min pre-intervention, pre-reveal in anticipation session); (2) pre-intervention (after reveal); and (3) post-intervention. An accuracy-weighted response time (RTLISAS) was the primary outcome, analyzed with a linear mixed effects modeling approach. Results There was an interaction between condition and time (p = 0.003) and between session and time (p = 0.015). RTLISAS was better post-exercise than post-rest and post-deception, but was similar across conditions at other timepoints. RTLISAS improved across time in session 1 and session 2, but did not improve over time in session 3. There were also main effects of condition (p = 0.024), session (p = 0.005), time (p<0.001), and congruency (p<0.001). Conclusions Cognitive control improved after moderate aerobic exercise, but not in anticipation of exercise. Improvements on a Flanker task were also observed across sessions and time, indicative of a learning effect that should be considered in study design and analyses.

Segmentation and estimation of claim severity in motor third-party liability insurance through contrast analysis

“…Marginal means and contrast analysis are mainly used in the natural sciences, e.g., in ecology and environmental science (Rivers et al, 2017;Quigley et al, 2018), in plant science (Byrne et al, 2017;Huzar-Novakowiski & Dorrance, 2018), in biological science (Colin et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2019), in the human sciences, e.g., in medicine and sports medicine (Bae et al, 2017;Bergelt et al, 2020;Ennour-Idrissi et al, 2016), and in psychology (Olivera-La Rosa et al, 2020), but their application in actuarial science is rare. While some scientific articles use marginal means analysis, the application of contrast analysis is much less widespread, even though it is a relatively simple and effective statistical method for testing the differences between groups of means (Šoltés et al, 2019).…”

The effects of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on cognitive function in individuals with stroke-induced mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled pilot study

“…Moderate aerobic exercise has been specifically linked to enhanced cognitive control ( 16 ). Research indicates that both moderate- and high-intensity aerobic exercises are more effective than low-intensity exercises in improving cognitive function.…”