2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6qi00394j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models to predict the magnetic properties of single- and multiple-bridged phosphate CuII systems: a theoretical DFT insight

Abstract: Models for the 1,1 and 1,3-bridging modes of phosphate for copper(ii) compounds were developed. Using unrestricted corresponding orbitals (UCO), a graphical identification of the predominant exchange pathway was described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the experimental value at 72 cm –1 is about 2 times larger than the DFT ones. Despite this, the overall picture is quite well represented and the DFT calculations presented here tend to validate the structural rationalization done by Mehrani et al The ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic characters of both J 1 and J 2 couplings have been justified regarding the Cu–O–Cu angles of both pairs of magnetic centers and the empirical relationship of Hatfield. Indeed, it has been observed a dependence of the exchange coupling in binuclear Cu­(II) complexes bridged by hydroxo groups on the Cu–O–Cu angles, which tends to be antiferromagnetic for an angle greater than 97.5° and ferromagnetic otherwise. Regarding the antiferromagnetic J 1 coupling, both concerned Cu–O–Cu angles are at about 99°, while for the ferromagnetic J 2 couplings, they are at about 97° (see ref for further discussions).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, the experimental value at 72 cm –1 is about 2 times larger than the DFT ones. Despite this, the overall picture is quite well represented and the DFT calculations presented here tend to validate the structural rationalization done by Mehrani et al The ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic characters of both J 1 and J 2 couplings have been justified regarding the Cu–O–Cu angles of both pairs of magnetic centers and the empirical relationship of Hatfield. Indeed, it has been observed a dependence of the exchange coupling in binuclear Cu­(II) complexes bridged by hydroxo groups on the Cu–O–Cu angles, which tends to be antiferromagnetic for an angle greater than 97.5° and ferromagnetic otherwise. Regarding the antiferromagnetic J 1 coupling, both concerned Cu–O–Cu angles are at about 99°, while for the ferromagnetic J 2 couplings, they are at about 97° (see ref for further discussions).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Using the PHI software, [20] the temperature dependence of χT vs T curves for 2 and 3 were fitted. The presence of 1,3‐O−P−O phosphate bridges between the copper centres in complex 2 (Figure 4), is responsible for the observed antiferromagnetic interaction, as has been demonstrated by computational studies on previously reported X‐ray structures and magnetic data of dinuclear copper complexes [21] . Adaptation of this model for 2 results in very close agreement of the experimental data with fitted data yielding the values of J=−5.60 cm −1 , g=2.14, and χ TIP= 1.2×10 −4 cm 3 mol −1 (Figure 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Where H, J12, Ŝ1, and Ŝ2 are the spin Hamiltonian, the magnetic coupling constant between fragment 1 and 2, the spin operators for fragment 1, and the spin operator for fragment 2, respectively. The broken-symmetry approach with non-projected spin employed has been extensively used for transition metal complexes [63][64][65][66][67]. The J values were calculated as follows [68,69]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%