2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19662.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of the compact jet in GRS 1915+105

Abstract: In this article, models are constructed of the compact jet in GRS 1915+105 during an epoch of optimal data capture. On 2003 April 2, the object was observed in the hard X‐ray/soft gamma‐ray band (INTEGRAL), hard X‐ray band (RXTE), near‐IR (ESO/New Technology Telescope) and the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) (8.3 and 15 GHz). The source was in a so‐called ‘high plateau state’. The large radio flux provides high signal‐to‐noise ratios in the radio images. Thus, one can image the jet out to large distances (>101… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The constraint, V app ≫ D/T ≈ 0.36c noted above (that is required to produce the temporal exponential decay) disagrees with the jet velocity found in Ribo et al (2004) by considering jet bilateral asymmetry due to Doppler abberation of an intrinsically bilaterally symmetric system One other curious feature of the slowly varying jet scenario is evident if the details of the power law models of Punsly (2011) are considered. The base of the jet that produces the majority of the 15 GHz flux density is located < 3 × 10 7 cm from the central black hole (see Table 1 and Figure 2 of Punsly (2011)). Considering the time scales for decay of 3.8 hrs and 8.6 hrs from Figure 2, turning down the power of the jet by moving plasma in the disk at the base of the jet corresponds to a rather suspect slow radial velocity of ∼ 10 3 cm/s.…”
Section: Comparison To Alternative Models Of Jet Fadingcontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The constraint, V app ≫ D/T ≈ 0.36c noted above (that is required to produce the temporal exponential decay) disagrees with the jet velocity found in Ribo et al (2004) by considering jet bilateral asymmetry due to Doppler abberation of an intrinsically bilaterally symmetric system One other curious feature of the slowly varying jet scenario is evident if the details of the power law models of Punsly (2011) are considered. The base of the jet that produces the majority of the 15 GHz flux density is located < 3 × 10 7 cm from the central black hole (see Table 1 and Figure 2 of Punsly (2011)). Considering the time scales for decay of 3.8 hrs and 8.6 hrs from Figure 2, turning down the power of the jet by moving plasma in the disk at the base of the jet corresponds to a rather suspect slow radial velocity of ∼ 10 3 cm/s.…”
Section: Comparison To Alternative Models Of Jet Fadingcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In the context of GRS 1915+105, models based on Ghisellini et al (1985); Ghisellini and Maraschi (1989); Ghisellini et al (1996) were applied to the compact jet (Punsly 2011). The mod-els described the surface brightness profile of the compact jet considered here (in the next subsection and Figure 4) as well as the broadband spectral energy distribution.…”
Section: Previous Models Of Compact Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The kinetic powers of AGN jets have previously been estimated using radio source dynamical models (Machalski et al 2004;Krause 2005;Shabala et al 2008;Punsly 2011;Turner & Shabala 2015), hot X-ray gas cavity observations (Rafferty et al 2006;Bîrzan et al 2008;Cavagnolo et al 2010), lobe expansion speeds using spectral fitting (Daly et al 2012), strong shocks around the lobes (Croston et al 2009), and measurements of the properties of the jet termination shocks (hotspots; . However, there is a lack of reliable and generally applicable methods to estimate jet power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%