1986
DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198611000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of Spinal Cord Injury: Part 1

Abstract: Testing of potential therapies for spinal cord injury has been significantly hampered by the unavailability of a standardized, reproducible animal model with predictable outcome at a given force of injury (dose-response). The rat was selected in the development of this model in preference to larger animals for economy and availability; this permits use of large numbers of animals to increase statistical validity. In the experiments reported in this article, a static load method (weight placed gently on cord) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each rat was mounted on an apparatus to induce injury to the spinal cord by the static load technique. [13][14][15] Following pentobarbital sodium anesthesia by intraperitoneal injection, a laminectomy was performed at T8 and T9 to expose the dorsal aspect of the dural tube. The dura was compressed by gently lowering a 120 g weight onto a 2 ϫ 3 mm surface area of the spinal cord for 2 minutes using a compression apparatus to produce a severe SCI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each rat was mounted on an apparatus to induce injury to the spinal cord by the static load technique. [13][14][15] Following pentobarbital sodium anesthesia by intraperitoneal injection, a laminectomy was performed at T8 and T9 to expose the dorsal aspect of the dural tube. The dura was compressed by gently lowering a 120 g weight onto a 2 ϫ 3 mm surface area of the spinal cord for 2 minutes using a compression apparatus to produce a severe SCI.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weightdrop method was criticized because of the difficulty to standardize the trauma. [15,49] The motor grading scales were low for all groups (1.0) except the sham-operated group and remained the same for the rest of the study, although there were progress in inclined-plane scores. Tail movement lasted for 3-4 seconds 13 seconds after the clip was applied, then the tail remained atonic indicating paraplegia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Each section was evaluated by an experienced pathologist blinded to the groups and test materials. For histopathological evaluation of the SCI, a grading system described by Black et al [8] was applied to all specimens as follows ( macrophage and/or histiocyte infiltration with white matter loss and central cavitation.…”
Section: Specimen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] Biochemical determinations were carried out by two biochemists blinded to the animal groups and test materials. Frozen tissue samples were weighed and homogenized in 1:10 (w:v) potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH: 7.4) using a dounce homogenizer.…”
Section: Specimen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%