2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0752-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of nanoparticles movement, collision, and friction in chemical mechanical polishing (CMP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value was estimated to be 100-1000 nN for a 200 nm nanoparticle following the method used in [51,52] and was in line with the modeling values from the literature [5,[10][11][12]14,51,52]. The use of surfactants showed a nonlinear behavior of the lateral forces, observing a normal force, for 250 nm nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Stabilization Of Cmp Slurriessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This value was estimated to be 100-1000 nN for a 200 nm nanoparticle following the method used in [51,52] and was in line with the modeling values from the literature [5,[10][11][12]14,51,52]. The use of surfactants showed a nonlinear behavior of the lateral forces, observing a normal force, for 250 nm nanoparticles, as shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Stabilization Of Cmp Slurriessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…By scanning with an atomic force microscope (AFM) of the selective layer after the chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) process it is found that the surface of the oxide layer is removed at different rates depending on the depth of removal and the pH of the solution. CMP is a material removal and surface smoothing process, which is possible by the combination of chemical and mechanical interactions [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14][15][16] Recently, several atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based techniques have been used to measure the interaction forces between various surfaces in CMP for better understanding of the removal mechanisms.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 COF depends on the applied down pressure, particle-surface interactions, and material properties of the surfaces in contact. [14][15][16] In Figures 4.1 and 4.2, the COF data and removal rates of SiO 2 films, respectively, are shown as a function of the applied down pressure. The COF and removal rate data were obtained by polishing SiO 2 films with 1 wt% ceria slurry without any additive and with 15 and 25 mM DADMAC all at pH 4.…”
Section: Afm Force Measurements-mentioning
confidence: 99%