2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-015-9299-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models of Ethics Consultation Used by Canadian Ethics Consultants: A Qualitative Study

Abstract: This article describes a qualitative study of models of ethics consultation used by ethics consultants in Canada. We found four different models used by Canadian ethics consultants whom we interviewed, and one sub-variant. We describe (1) the lone ethics consultant model, (1a) the hub-and-spokes sub-variant of this model; (2) the ethics committee model; (3) the capacity-building model; and (4) the facilitated model. Previous empirical studies of ethics consultation describe only two or three of these models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Second, consider the different models for clinical ethics consultation; for example, single consultants might not need a theory or practices to resolve disagreement in the same way as ethics committees would, just to suggest one obvious structural difference. For a helpful explanation of different models, both the aforementioned and others, as employed in Canada, see the work of Kaposy C et al 7 However, we do take notice of the prominence of principlism, which is our reason for highlighting it. As noted in a recently published guide for healthcare ethics committees, which adopts a principlist framework, while mentioning others:Autonomy is the ethical principle widely considered most central to health care decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6 Second, consider the different models for clinical ethics consultation; for example, single consultants might not need a theory or practices to resolve disagreement in the same way as ethics committees would, just to suggest one obvious structural difference. For a helpful explanation of different models, both the aforementioned and others, as employed in Canada, see the work of Kaposy C et al 7 However, we do take notice of the prominence of principlism, which is our reason for highlighting it. As noted in a recently published guide for healthcare ethics committees, which adopts a principlist framework, while mentioning others:Autonomy is the ethical principle widely considered most central to health care decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…They work from a paradigm of analysing the problem and making recommendations on ethically acceptable ways forward. The US and Canadian models, whilst also having such committees also rely on clinical ethics consultants 21,35,36 ; their role may be more as advisors than as mediators, but mediation also may be part of the process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the individual ethics consultant, with or without support of health care professionals with ethics training (a "hub and spokes" approach), provides guidance with regard to particular cases upon request [20]. Second, the capacity-building consultant focuses on training health care staff in ethics decision making, often using a particular framework [20]. Third, in a facilitation or team approach an ethics consultant (responsible for ethics analysis and framing), a facilitator (responsible for the process and ensuring procedures are followed), and, with luck, a recorder join other resource people and stakeholders to address an ethics issue [20].…”
Section: Ethics Consultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethics committees are the main approach to addressing ethical issues in hospitals in the US [19], although ethics consultation can take many forms. First, the individual ethics consultant, with or without support of health care professionals with ethics training (a "hub and spokes" approach), provides guidance with regard to particular cases upon request [20]. Second, the capacity-building consultant focuses on training health care staff in ethics decision making, often using a particular framework [20].…”
Section: Ethics Consultationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation