Models of Cognition and Their Applications in Behavioral Economics: A Conceptual Framework for Nudging Derived From Behavior Analysis and Relational Frame Theory

Abstract

This paper puts forward a rounder conceptual model for interpreting short- and long-term effects of choice behavior. As a further development of dual-process theory, Kahneman (2003) distinguished between intuition and reasoning, which served as the respective precursors of the cognitive processing systems 1 and 2. We maintain that they reflect the more rigorous distinction between brief and immediate and extended and elaborated relational responding, which may be reinterpreted through an analysis of their functional properties. Repertoires of relational responding are offered by the multi-dimensional multi-level model. Specifically, we provide a conceptual account of how nudging, or the manipulation of environmental contingencies, works on the creation and modification of relational framing. Educative nudges, or boosts, are a subset of nudges that may more easily maintain target choice behavior in the future. The central role of verbal behavior is essential toward formulating rules, which inform and guide choice behavior over time. Although nudges are traditionally regarded as System 1-steered aspects, they are herein regarded as cues for responding to relational frames, which may induce System 2-steered aspects. We suggest adopting the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP) to inform how coherent and immediate responding to novel relational responding may occur in the presence of choice behavior. Several examples are included to support the claim of encompassing relational responding and choice behavior. We address the instances of consumer behavior, stereotypy and prejudices, eating behavior, and overcoming cognitive biases. The conclusions depict a promising way forward for the study of choice: an improved model for interpreting and overcoming human errors, due to changes in the contingencies of behavior.

The ubiquity of social reinforcement: A nudging exploratory study to reduce the overuse of smartphones in social contexts

“…Nevertheless, it does not seem clear where the cutoff lies, nor how this may be operationalized (e.g., Marchiori et al, 2015). We recommend that nudging research be less arbitrary concerning its definition and empirical scope, and that there is more consistency between theory and its applications (Tagliabue et al, 2019). Some nudging experiments have notably manipulated the consequences of behavior, providing incentives; they reached beyond the mere manipulation of contextual variables preceding the behavior.…”

A Systematic Review of Nudge Interventions to Optimize Medication Prescribing

“…To fill this gap, the third data extraction template complied information about concepts described in the behavioral economics literature. While these concepts are not explicitly called techniques, some can certainly be used to change behavior ( Vlaev et al, 2016 ; Tagliabue et al, 2019 ). For instance, the MINDSPACE framework summarizes nine of the most robust and non-coercive influences on behavior ( Dolan et al, 2010 ; Kahneman, 2011 ; Dolan et al, 2012 ).…”

Non-pharmaceutical interventions to optimize cancer immunotherapy

“… 127–129 DTx can be realized as (embodied) conversational agents. 130–135 or wearable devices, 136–138 and may employ different techniques from behavioral medicine and clinical psychology for health-promoting behavior, including cognitive behavioral therapy, 139–141 mindfulness-based approaches, 142 , 143 goal setting and action planning, 144–146 and motivational tools such as nudges, 147 , 148 gamification, 149 , 150 and rewards/incentives, 151 , 152 or a combination of these techniques. 153 , 154 DTx that target behavior change in cancer immunotherapy patients may comprise ICB-specific health literacy programs, diaries and questionnaires, and practical modules including physical activity schedules, activity tracking, nutrition plans, breathing exercises, and meditation techniques.…”