2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25156-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models in Software Architecture Derivation and Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, several methods for evaluating software architectures have been defined: scenario-based (SAAM, architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM), ALMA , etc.) [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], mathematical model-based (reliability analysis, performance analysis) [ 46 ] and metrics-based software architecture evaluation methods (QuADAI ) [ 47 ]. In order to evaluate the advantages of the proposed architecture, based on the previously-mentioned methods, a simplified approach of the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) has been selected to perform a comparative analysis [ 40 , 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, several methods for evaluating software architectures have been defined: scenario-based (SAAM, architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM), ALMA , etc.) [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ], mathematical model-based (reliability analysis, performance analysis) [ 46 ] and metrics-based software architecture evaluation methods (QuADAI ) [ 47 ]. In order to evaluate the advantages of the proposed architecture, based on the previously-mentioned methods, a simplified approach of the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) has been selected to perform a comparative analysis [ 40 , 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The list of AOMs in Table I was compiled from several surveys that were conducted over the years: 4 from 2004[2], 7 from 2006[36], 8 from 2008[44], 2 from 2012[4,46], 7 from 2014[1,17], and 2 from 2020[14,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%