It is argued that a central role for models and modelling would greatly increase the authenticity of the science curriculum. The range of ontological states available for the notion of 'model' is outlined, together with the modes available for their representation. Issues in the selection of models for and the development of modelling skills within the model-based curriculum are presented. It is suggested that learning within such a curriculum entails: acquiring an acceptable understanding of what a model is and how modelling takes place; having a developed capacity to mentally visualise models; understanding the natures of analogy and of metaphor, processes which are central to models and modelling. The emphases required in teaching for this learning to be supported are discussed. Finally, implications of the model-based curriculum for teacher education are evaluated. It is concluded that a great deal of detailed research and development will be needed if the potential of this change in emphasis within the science curriculum is to be realised.KEY WORDS: analogy and metaphor, authentic science education, learning models and modelling, model-based curriculum, models and modelling, teacher education for models and modelling, teaching models and modelling CURRENT CHALLENGES TO SCIENCE EDUCATION Many of those countries that currently aspire to achieve and retain prosperous economies place great value on the provision of science education for all citizens, not only during the years of schooling but also throughout life. The pattern of reactions by individuals to these national aspirations is mixed. In some countries the demand for science education is high, yet in others this is far from being the case. What is common across this spectrum of response is a feeling that science education currently faces a range of challenges.Students commonly find the subject -matter of science to be abstract, couched in complex language, and too often of insufficient immediate interest. This can lead to a lower than desired attainment in examinations and hence to a disinclination to continue the study of science beyond what is mandatory. The teaching of science requires a broad range of knowledge at some considerable depth of understanding, conditions often not supported by the 'modular' structures of courses provided by many uni-