1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for the structure of outer-membrane proteins of Escherichia coli derived from raman spectroscopy and prediction methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
192
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 350 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
192
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that a portion of the OmpA C terminus (including some of the proposed transmembrane segments) may adopt an a-helical conformation and be located inside the porin channel, at least in porins with closed channels. This hypothesis is consistent with predictions for a-helical content in the C-terminal domain made on the basis of Raman spectroscopy (Vogel & Jahnig, 1986) and computer methods (Jeanteur et al, 1994;Koebnik, 1995) and may explain why the N-terminal eight-stranded domain can exist alone in the membrane in a stable conformation (Ried et al, 1994). Transmembrane segments M9, MI I , and MI5 are suitable candidates for folding into an a-helical conformation and residing inside the @-barrel channel.…”
Section: Stathopoulossupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that a portion of the OmpA C terminus (including some of the proposed transmembrane segments) may adopt an a-helical conformation and be located inside the porin channel, at least in porins with closed channels. This hypothesis is consistent with predictions for a-helical content in the C-terminal domain made on the basis of Raman spectroscopy (Vogel & Jahnig, 1986) and computer methods (Jeanteur et al, 1994;Koebnik, 1995) and may explain why the N-terminal eight-stranded domain can exist alone in the membrane in a stable conformation (Ried et al, 1994). Transmembrane segments M9, MI I , and MI5 are suitable candidates for folding into an a-helical conformation and residing inside the @-barrel channel.…”
Section: Stathopoulossupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In an attempt to correlate immunologic, biochemical, and genetic data derived from studies on proteins of the OmpA family with the three computer predictions described above, I constructed a new OmpA model. More specifically, this model was based on (1) OmpA topology data from previous studies (Chen et al, 1980;Braun & Cole, 1984;Morona et al, 1984Morona et al, , 1985Vogel & Jahnig, 1986;Freudl, 1989;Ried et al, 1994;Ruppert et al, 1994); (2) the OmpA structure predictions of Jeanteur et al,Schirmer and Cowan,and Ferenci;(3) topological information from studies on the OprF C-terminal region (Wong et al, 1993;Rawling et al, 1995); and (4) two recent reports (De Mot & Vanderleyden, 1994;Koebnik, 1995) that identified conserved residues and a common sequence motif between OmpA-related outer membrane proteins and MotB, a peptidoglycan-associated protein of gram-positive bacteria. OmpA residues involved in direct interaction with peptidoglycan are expected to lie on the periplasmic side of the membrane.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A somewhat analogous structure has been proposed for the Escherichia coli outer membrane protein OmpA (5,12,18), and these proteins, which also share some functional similarities, are considered orthologs. Consistent with this concept, significant amino acid sequence similarity has been detected between OprF and OmpA, but only in their C-terminal domains (39% identity, 56% similarity).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For example, folded OmpA migrates at 30 kDa, whereas unfolded OmpA migrates at 35 kDa [19]. The 30-kDa form has been shown by Raman, FT-IR and CD spectroscopy [20,22,23,25,27,28], by phage inactivation assays [19] and by single-channel conductivity measurements [29] to correspond to completely folded and functionally active OmpA. The different electrophoretic mobilities of folded and unfolded OmpA have also been used to determine the kinetics of native structure formation with a simple kinetic gel-shift assay, taking advantage of the inhibition of OmpA folding by SDS [23,30,31].…”
Section: In Vitro Requirements For Membrane Protein Foldingmentioning
confidence: 99%