2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for the mechanical characterization of core-shell microcapsules under uniaxial deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The point of contact between the rigid capillary and the neurospheres during static compression and the point at which contact is lost (separation) during decompression are not the same in a single run, and also change from one run to the next. To determine the point of contact in each case, we used the method suggested by Huang et al [ 33 ] with a slight modification to make the fitting routine more robust for our data. Specifically, a portion of the data is fit to the following function y = { 0 x < b 2 m ( x b 2 ) 1 + n 2 x b 2 where y is the dependent variable (the force, in our case); x is the independent variable (the displacement or strain); and m , b , and n are adjustable parameters, with b 2 corresponding to the point of contact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point of contact between the rigid capillary and the neurospheres during static compression and the point at which contact is lost (separation) during decompression are not the same in a single run, and also change from one run to the next. To determine the point of contact in each case, we used the method suggested by Huang et al [ 33 ] with a slight modification to make the fitting routine more robust for our data. Specifically, a portion of the data is fit to the following function y = { 0 x < b 2 m ( x b 2 ) 1 + n 2 x b 2 where y is the dependent variable (the force, in our case); x is the independent variable (the displacement or strain); and m , b , and n are adjustable parameters, with b 2 corresponding to the point of contact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, for polymeric capsule ν is supposed to be close to 0.5 for the sake of simplicity (see further). By fitting the experimental data using Equation ( 6), the elastic modulus can be measured reliably even for a liquid-core capsule [57]. For gellan gum microcapsules, this technique yields to measure the shell Young's modulus ranging from 10 kPa to 50 kPa, depending on the concentration of gellan gum [57].…”
Section: Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By fitting the experimental data using Equation ( 6), the elastic modulus can be measured reliably even for a liquid-core capsule [57]. For gellan gum microcapsules, this technique yields to measure the shell Young's modulus ranging from 10 kPa to 50 kPa, depending on the concentration of gellan gum [57]. However, for large deformation a more sophisticated mechanical analysis has to be conducted.…”
Section: Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the concept of effective modulus of the microcapsule, or the overall stiffness, was only discussed in this work without consideration of the core‐shell geometry of microcapsules. In order to take account of this geometry in a large deformation regime, modified Reissner theory or core‐shell Tatara theory should be used instead 74 …”
Section: Mechanical Characterization Of Soft Microparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to take account of this geometry in a large deformation regime, modified Reissner theory or coreshell Tatara theory should be used instead. 74…”
Section: Microelectromechanical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%