1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(97)00299-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for the computation of ultrasonic fields and their interaction with defects in realistic NDT configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these computations Auld's reciprocity relation [10] is convenient to use, since it only presupposes knowledge of the action of the probe acting as transmitter. Auld's result relates two elastodynamic states: state (1) with displacement u (1) and corresponding traction t (1) = σ (1) · n obtained when the transmitting probe (T) acts as a transmitter in the presence of the scatterer, and state (2) with displacement u (2) and corresponding traction t (2) = σ (2) · n obtained when the receiving probe (R) acts as a transmitter in the absence of the scatterer. The result is then that the change δΓ in transmission coefficient (or reflection coefficient in the common case of pulseecho testing where the same probe acts as both transmitter and receiver) due to the presence of the scatterer is given by:…”
Section: The Probe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For these computations Auld's reciprocity relation [10] is convenient to use, since it only presupposes knowledge of the action of the probe acting as transmitter. Auld's result relates two elastodynamic states: state (1) with displacement u (1) and corresponding traction t (1) = σ (1) · n obtained when the transmitting probe (T) acts as a transmitter in the presence of the scatterer, and state (2) with displacement u (2) and corresponding traction t (2) = σ (2) · n obtained when the receiving probe (R) acts as a transmitter in the absence of the scatterer. The result is then that the change δΓ in transmission coefficient (or reflection coefficient in the common case of pulseecho testing where the same probe acts as both transmitter and receiver) due to the presence of the scatterer is given by:…”
Section: The Probe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auld's relation then yields: (4) i (x)σ (2) ij (x)n j (x) ds. (5.11) This signal response is useful for comparisons, as it gives the response of an unflawed medium.…”
Section: The Probe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Champ-Sons model has been developed for several years [6], and validated using comparisons with other models -angular spectrum and finite elements method [7] -, and experiments [8]. This model, based on the Rayleigh integral extended to take account of refraction through a Fluid/Solid interface, gives accurate and quantitative results assuming that both field computation and source points are not close to the interface (about…”
Section: A Computation Model For Ndt Configurations: Champ-sonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rayleigh integral extended to take into account the refraction postulates that the elastic field is the sum of contributions of running source points of the transducer (see Calmon et al [6] for a review), which can be expressed as : (1) where u(r, t) is the acoustic quantity considered (e.g. vector displacement, scalar potential), DF(r lr ) is the divergence factor, C:' u (9 f , t) is the transmission coefficient, and v n (r lr , t -t shape (r lr ) -Tpalh (r lr ,r» is the delayed particle velocity of an elementary source point of the radiating surface Tr.…”
Section: General Formulation Of the Rayleigh Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%