2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for numerical failure analysis of wooden structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some comments on the PFM strength predictions and on their correlation to the experimental test 33 results concerning the four design parameters are given below: 34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some comments on the PFM strength predictions and on their correlation to the experimental test 33 results concerning the four design parameters are given below: 34…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under drying, crosslaminates failed in terms of cracking. Appropriate models were introduced by [20][21][22][23][24], among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the TSAI-WU criterion, a multi-surface plasticity with hardening and softening rules, respectively, for each material direction and depending on the type of loading has been developed to capture the characteristics of wood [21]. The model is based on the experimental data of [26].…”
Section: Modelling Of Damage and Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ductile failure is modelled using multi-surface plasticity formulations to cover each material direction. Brittle failure is captured by a fracture mechanical based formulation with cohesive elements [21,22]. The models are enhanced to describe the hygromechanical coupling [23,24].…”
Section: Materials Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%