2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models for characterising the aerodynamics of insect-proof screens from their geometric parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insect-proof screen (IPS) installed at the vents is a 13 × 30 threads•cm −2 (Figure 2), whose geometric properties can be characterized according to Valera et al [30]. Following the methodology, Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the IPS under study, which is a standard IPS in greenhouses in the Mediterranean region of Almería because of its demonstrated good ventilation properties together with exclusion of most insects typical of the area [25]. The size of the greenhouse is similar to the average greenhouse that can be found in the Mediterranean region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insect-proof screen (IPS) installed at the vents is a 13 × 30 threads•cm −2 (Figure 2), whose geometric properties can be characterized according to Valera et al [30]. Following the methodology, Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the IPS under study, which is a standard IPS in greenhouses in the Mediterranean region of Almería because of its demonstrated good ventilation properties together with exclusion of most insects typical of the area [25]. The size of the greenhouse is similar to the average greenhouse that can be found in the Mediterranean region.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the aerodynamic properties of IPS is then also an impor-tant aspect in order to understand their impact on ventilation. López-Martínez et al [25] obtained mathematical models for the characterization of insect-proof screens, which were related to geometric aspects (diameter of threads, porosity, etc.) with parameters of interest for ventilation, such as permeability, inertia factor, and pressure drop coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is expressed as a function of the velocity of the air passing through the WS according to ∆P = a 1 U 2 + a 2 U [8,38,39]. In this equation, a 1 and a 2 are two modelling coefficients that depend on two important mechanical characteristics of the mesh: the permeability of the porous medium (K p ), which depends on the geometry of the porous medium; and the inertial factor (Y ), which depends on the nature of the porous media [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much more recently, Lopez et al [40] developed more advanced models that allow to estimate K p from the two-dimensional porosity and the diameter of the threads; and Y from the diameter of the threads and the diameter of the inner circumference of the pore. Wind tunnel measurements and CFD numerical modelling has been also a support in other investigations to achieve better characterisations [43] or to identify key parameters (pressure loss coefficient, drag coefficient and tunnel experiments [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, insect-proof screenhouses (IP-SH) have gained a lot of interest among growers. These simple and cheap structures offer advantages such as the protection of the crops against pests, reduction of excessive solar radiation levels and, a higher water efficiency use which is relevant in drought prone warm regions [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%