Models and Methods in Social-Scientific Interpretation: a Response To Philip Esler

Abstract

Philip Esler's lengthy review of The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspon dence focused on theoretical and methodological issues which are important to the debate about how a social-scientific approach to the New Testament should be developed and practised. This essay responds to Esler's arguments, particularly those concerning the use of models. First, drawing on the work of various social scientists, especially anthropologists, it is argued that a model-based approach is open to serious criticisms. The problems with such an approach are illustrated from Esler's most recent book. Secondly, the weaknesses in Berger and Luckmann's theory of 'the social construction of reality' are further demonstrated. These weak nesses indicate that their important insights need to be woven into the framework of a more critical social theory. Thirdly, and most briefly, the significance of the major argument of The Social Ethos is defended.

Autism and Biblical Studies: Establishing and Extending the Field beyond Preliminary Reflection

“…The use of models in social scientific biblical research has not gone without criticism (cf. Horrell, 2000), but the discussion and debate around this means that many biblical scholars are well positioned to engage with their significance to the field of autism research with less naivete than some of those currently operating within it, who often work unaware that their own language is actually determined by the tacit adoption of a particular model.…”

Los afluentes y los ríos: La construcción social del medio ambiente en la cuenca Lerma Chapala

“…Limitantes del enfoque de construcción social de la realidad Horrell (2000) y Robteutscher (2000) critican la construcción social de la realidad como la proponían Berger y Luckmann (2003, versión original de 1968) y plantean sea complementada con estudios sobre el poder que tiene cada agente involucrado para proponer sus elementos de construcción. Ya Hannigan (1995) avanzaba en este sentido al sostener que la construcción social del medio ambiente (csMa) es una aplicación válida de la construcción social de la realidad pero que se da como una negociación entre partes; Lezama (2004) agrega que se trata de una negociación de poder.…”

Method and Models in New Testament Interpretation: A Critical Engagement With Louise Lawrence’s Literary Ethnography

“…Lawrence’s first chapter is a critical engagement with the honor and shame model in NT social‐scientific criticism. While she in no way denies the importance of the modeling enterprise in bridging the gap between the ancient world and the modern interpreter (the goal that motivates Bruce Malina’s work), she does have a number of concerns: that models are too focused on ideal social qualities to ever be fully realized in real people; that models cannot be flexible enough to admit new data; that because of this inflexibility, divergent data are either ignored or forced to fit the model (see Esler 2000; Horrell 2000).…”