Models and Mechanisms of Succession: An Example From a Rocky Intertidal Community

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 139.184.Abstract. An investigation of the processes that cause succession was performed in an intertidal community on the central Oregon coast. The community was dominated by barnacles and several species of macroalgae. The successional sequence was determined at three different sites by clearing sets of plots in a way that mimicked natural disturbance. Succession at each of these sites followed the same general sequence. A barnacle, Chthamalus da/li, first colonized the plots and was later replaced by a second barnacle, Balanus glandula. The macroalgae Pelvetiopsis limitata, Fucus distichus, and Endoc/adia muricata colonized the plots only after Balanus was established. While the order of species arrival and departure was consistent, the rate of succession varied greatly among sites. The sequence of community development that was observed at one site over a 36-mo period occurred in < 12 mo in a nearby area. Differences in the rate of succession appeared to result from variation in the timing of successful Balanus recruitment.The mechanisms of succession were investigated in a series of field experiments. An experiment with Balanus-removal, Chthamalus-removal, and control plots was used to assess the interactions between barnacles. A direct interaction, competition for space with Balanus, caused Chthamalus to decrease in abundance as succession proceeded. Chthamalus did not affect the establishment of Balanus. Successful Balanus recruitment depended on occasional periods of larval settlement followed by periods of favorable weather. At all three sites, algal colonization was dependent on the presence of barnacles. Balanus greatly facilitated algal colonization, while Chthamalus only weakly facilitated algal colonization. Facilitation of algal colonization by epoxy-filled barnacle tests indicated that facilitation resulted from barnacle tests altering the substrate, rather than the activities of the living animals. A factorial experiment involving manipulations of barnacle and consumer (limpet) abundances demonstrated that the facilitation of algae by barnacles is an indirect interaction that is mediated by limpets. Barnacles decreased limpet foraging activity and thereby increased algal abundance.Succession in this community is complicated by several processes that are not included in traditional views of succession. (1) Not all early successional species have the same effect on the establishment of later successional species. This results in spatial variation in the rate of succession.(2) The model of succession is different in each step in the successional sequence. The Chthamalus-Balanus interaction is an example of the tolerance model, while the ba...

Cool barnacles: Do common biogenic structures enhance or retard rates of deterioration of intertidal rocks and concrete?

“…Tests remain affixed to the surface after the organism dies (and may persist for several months and years) making them particularly practical targets for a laboratory study. Furthermore, the establishment of barnacles is an important early step in the development of diverse benthic communities (Farrell, 1991;Harley, 2006;Tews et al, 2004;Thompson et al, 1996), and there is considerable opportunity to facilitate their settlement and recruitment to engineered surfaces (for ecological gain) using simple textural manipulation (Coombes et al, 2015a). The influence of barnacles on deterioration processes, such as thermal degradation and salt weathering, is therefore an important question we aimed to address.…”

Community dynamics and ecosystem simplification in a high-CO 2 ocean

“…Recovery patterns, which are influenced by the external environment, recruitment rates, and species interactions (30,31), can lend insight into these important community dynamics. Highly variable and idiosyncratic recovery patterns (i.e., contingent succession, sensu ref.…”

“…32) suggest that recovery is dependent on recruitment patterns and species interactions that vary either spatially and/or temporally (33). However, strong predictable species interactions can also cause succession to be canalized (32), in which disturbed assemblages converge on a predictable community over time (30,31,34). This pattern of predictable species interactions and canalized succession could be driven by harsh environmental conditions, such as ocean acidification, in which species that can tolerate or benefit from the extreme conditions are the only species that are able to persist through time (35,36).…”

Assessing the Response of Estuarine Intertidal Assemblages to Urbanised Catchment Discharge

“…Increased recruitment and abundance of Mytilus edulis (one of two species of mussels recorded during this study) and Brachidontes rostratus have been observed at locations where sewage is present (Dakin, 1987;Hindell and Quinn, 2000). Furthermore, barnacles are rapid colonisers 25 and may delay succession of grazers (Sutherland and Karlson, 1977;Farrell, 1991;Mann, 2000).…”