Modelos para el análisis de políticas públicas en salud reportados en publicaciones científicas

Martínez, Gino Montenegro; Montoya, Adiley Carmona; Franco-Giraldo, Álvaro

doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.11.007

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Each item was appraised by the CASPe guide as follows: 1 point for those that complied with the criterion; 0.5 points for those studies that partially complied and 0 points for those that did not. The following categorisation was used for listing the studies as high, medium and low quality: the articles with a score below quartile 1 were classified as low quality and were rejected; the articles between quartiles 1 and 3 were classified as medium quality and those with a score above quartile 3 were defined as high quality 18 . After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the 18 articles that were selected, 16.67% (n = 3) were rejected by applying the above mentioned classification method.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Para ello, la valoración de cada ítem que propone la guía CASPe se llevó a cabo de la siguiente manera: 1 punto para aquellos que cumplían con el criterio; 0,5 puntos para los que lo cumplían parcialmente; y 0 puntos para aquellos que no cumplían con el criterio. La categorización en relación a la calidad baja, media y alta, se realizó como sigue: los artículos con una puntuación por debajo del cuartil 1 se clasificaron como de calidad baja y se descartaron; los artículos que se encontraban entre los cuartiles 1 y 3 se clasificaron como de calidad media; y aquellos con una puntuación mayor al cuartil 3 se clasificaron como de calidad alta 18 . De los 18 artículos seleccionados tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, un 16,67% (n = 3) fueron descartados haciendo uso de la metodología de clasificación anteriormente mencionada.…”

Section: Materials Y Métodounclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

The role of prison nursing: an integrative review

Isaac¹

2021

Rev Esp Sanid Penit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To review the scientific literature on the role of the nurse in Penitentiary Institutions through the study of care training and ethical implications when offering quality care to the prison population. Material and method: An integrative review was carried out in Medline, SciELO and LILACS databases. The MeSH and DeCS terms used were: nurse’s role, nursing, nurse, nursing education, prison, ethics, ethical issues, job satisfaction, enfermeria, penitenciaria, health professionals, nursing care. The types of studies included in this work are literature reviews, and qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies. The CASPe tool was used to assess the methodological quality of selected literature. The review period was October, November and December 2019. Results: A total of 264 articles were obtained, of which 98 were chosen after applying filters corresponding to each database and after discarding duplicate articles. The title and abstract of these articles were read and the established selection criteria were applied, to obtain 18 studies. Finally, after critical reading, 15 articles were selected for this work. Discussion: The role of the prison nurse is generally unknown. Nursing undergraduate training in this area is limited, exposing a specific training need, which may help these professionals to deal with ethical issues that they may find in their practice, as well as to improve the quality of care for the prison population.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Materials Y Métodounclassified

The role of prison nursing: an integrative review

Isaac¹

2021

Rev Esp Sanid Penit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Extending Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Policy Framework Through an Analysis of How Community Health Workers in India Are Driving Policy Changes

Santosh,

Kane

2023

Community Health Equity Research & Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we develop and provide a novel account of the process through which the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), a cadre of seemingly powerless community health workers in India, are navigating a complex policy process to incrementally achieve their goals. ASHAs have been demanding better working conditions, better compensation, and regularisation as public service employees through protests and strikes and have managed to gain concessions from both the Central and various State governments. We observed two important aspects that emerged: (a) ASHAs achieved incremental increases in their wages despite being the lowest in the health system hierarchy, and, (b) major gains were made during the 2 years of the pandemic. We examine and analyse ASHAs’ engagement and strategies used, both overt and covert, sometimes with the government, and the role of other actors in determining these policy outcomes. We do so by drawing on academic literature and news media reports; we trace the changes in ASHAs’ wages by tying together key events, ‘windows of opportunity’, and actions of ‘policy entrepreneurs’ involved in the process. In doing so, we further develop and propose an extension to Kingdon’s multiple streams policy framework through the addition of a ‘narrative stream’.

show abstract