2015
DOI: 10.14688/1984-3801/gst.v8n2p17-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelos de Determinação Não Destrutiva de Área Foliar de Feijão Caupi Vigna unguiculata (L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An efficient way to evaluate vegetative growth is by the length and width variables. The use of linear leaf measurements allows the monitoring of leaf development in the field without the need to collect the leaf, implying a simple and less costly procedure, and these two characteristics are efficient in estimating leaf area (OLIVEIRA et al, 2016). According to Sachet et al (2015), the joint analysis of these two variables allows obtaining better coefficients of determination when compared with other methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient way to evaluate vegetative growth is by the length and width variables. The use of linear leaf measurements allows the monitoring of leaf development in the field without the need to collect the leaf, implying a simple and less costly procedure, and these two characteristics are efficient in estimating leaf area (OLIVEIRA et al, 2016). According to Sachet et al (2015), the joint analysis of these two variables allows obtaining better coefficients of determination when compared with other methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Candido, Coelho, Maia, Cunha, & Silva, 2013), Acrocomia aculeata Jacq. (Mota, Leite, & Cano, 2014), Merremia aegyptia (L.) Urban (Assis, Linhares, Souza, Pereira, & Almeida, 2015), and for cultivated species, such as Ananas comosus L. (Merrill) (Francisco, Diotto, Folegatti, Silva, & Piedade, 2014), Vigna unguiculata (L.) (Oliveira et al, 2015), Mangifera indica L. (Silva, Cabanez, Mendonça, Pereira, & Amaral, 2015), Prunus persica (L.) (Sachet, Penso, Pertille, Guerrezii, & Citadin, 2015), Smallanthus sonchifolius (Poepp.) H. Rob.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the following were considered: Pearson's correlation coefficient (R), coefficient of determination (r 2 ) and the concordance index d (Willmott et al, 1985). In addition, the following statistical errors were estimated: mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean of the square error (SRMSE) (quoted by Oliveira et al, 2015) and the c performance coefficient of Camargo and Sentelhas (Camargo & Sentelhas, 1997).…”
Section: Model Used For Adjustment Of the Species Biomass Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%