2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10020202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Water Stress in a Shiraz Vineyard Using Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning

Abstract: Abstract:The detection of water stress in vineyards plays an integral role in the sustainability of high-quality grapes and prevention of devastating crop loses. Hyperspectral remote sensing technologies combined with machine learning provides a practical means for modelling vineyard water stress. In this study, we applied two ensemble learners, i.e., random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), for discriminating stressed and non-stressed Shiraz vines using terrestrial hyperspectral imaging. Ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(66 reference statements)
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High-resolution thermal imagery obtained from a hyperspectral scanner was used to map canopy stomatal conductance (g s ) and CWSI of olive orchards where different irrigation treatments were applied [18]. With the large volume of spatial/spectral data extracted from the hyperspectral data cube, machine learning will likely be adopted more widely in the horticultural environment to model water stress [141]. See Reference [54] for a comprehensive review of hyperspectral and thermal remote sensing to detect plant water status.…”
Section: Hyperspectralmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High-resolution thermal imagery obtained from a hyperspectral scanner was used to map canopy stomatal conductance (g s ) and CWSI of olive orchards where different irrigation treatments were applied [18]. With the large volume of spatial/spectral data extracted from the hyperspectral data cube, machine learning will likely be adopted more widely in the horticultural environment to model water stress [141]. See Reference [54] for a comprehensive review of hyperspectral and thermal remote sensing to detect plant water status.…”
Section: Hyperspectralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variables can include spectral response, thermal response, meteorological data, 3D attributes of the canopy, and macrostructure of the block (farm). Clearly, there is an opportunity for a multi-disciplinary approach, potentially incorporating artificial intelligence techniques which incorporate the aforementioned variables to provide a robust estimation of crop water status [84,141,282,302,303]. Furthermore, with machine learning algorithms, hyperspectral remote sensing will provide a wealth of data to estimate crop water status.…”
Section: Future Prospective and Gaps In The Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus it makes XGBoost even faster than RF. Recently, it has been popular in many classification and crop mapping applications [39][40][41][42][43]. Considering the intensive computation requirements in sugarcane mapping utilizing different polarizations and random split sample sets, we chose the time efficiency algorithms including RF and XGBoost as classifiers and evaluated their performance.…”
Section: Feature Importance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we describe the modified version of DoTRules for hyperspectral image classification, before demonstrating its application in three different study areas. We quantify the accuracy of DoTRules for hyperspectral image classification, and compare the results against some popular state-of-the-art ensemble approaches, i.e., extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) [40,41], random forest (RF) [1,[42][43][44][45], rotation forests (RoFs) [46][47][48][49], regularised random forest (RRF) [50,51], as well as two non-ensemble algorithms, namely, support vector machine (SVM) [52][53][54][55][56], and deep belief network (DBN) [57,58] as the classic deep learning method. Although SVM and DBN are not ensemble methods, they are included in our comparison because of their popularity, as they have been repeatedly used in recent hyperspectral image classification studies using Indian Pines, Salinas and Pavia University datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%