2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling tree height–diameter relationships in multi-species and multi-layered forests: A large observational study from Northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Their model was best when they used stand basal area and dominant height. Good results using the generalized model were also obtained by Schröder and Álvarez-Gonzáles (2001), who used mean diameter, Soares and Tomé (2002), who used dominant height and Temesgen and von Gadow (2004) or Temesgen et al (2014), who used the stand variables like stand basal area per hectare, number of trees per hectare and stand basal area of larger trees per hectare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their model was best when they used stand basal area and dominant height. Good results using the generalized model were also obtained by Schröder and Álvarez-Gonzáles (2001), who used mean diameter, Soares and Tomé (2002), who used dominant height and Temesgen and von Gadow (2004) or Temesgen et al (2014), who used the stand variables like stand basal area per hectare, number of trees per hectare and stand basal area of larger trees per hectare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The development of a suitable H-D model is very important for estimating tree growth, biomass production, and carbon storage capacity, as well as for forest management and monitoring (Aishan et al, 2016;Schmidt et al, 2011;Vospernik et al, 2010). A wide variety of models have been proposed to determine the H-D relationships in different tree species, regions, and ecological zones (Feldpausch et al, 2011;Temesgen et al, 2014). Generally, the models can be divided into linear and nonlinear types, but the H-D relationship is influenced by numerous factors, particularly site quality and silvicultural treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach accounts for the variations in the height-diameter relationship, caused by the effect of species group-specific differences (Chapagain et al 2014;Temesgen et al 2014). The effect of species group-specific differences was best described by b 1 of a base model when it was expressed as a linear function of a species group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The height-diameter relationship varies more significantly in the multi-layered mixed species stands than in a single species and/or a single-layered stands due to the effects of species-specific differences. These effects can be modelled using a dummy variable approach (Chapagain et al 2014;Temesgen et al 2014). When there is a data limitation, developing a species-specific heightdiameter model for each of the several species that are present in the same sample plot is not possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%